We’re addicted to the next hyped player, forever living in a future rather then a present.
Some forward planning is obviously needed but we are forever waiting for the next superstar. We bring through the Coates, Fifitas, Cobbos, Piakuras, Rikis but rarely sign players like Boyd and Blair.
We are constantly turning our noses up at midrange or even good experienced options because we are so scared of losing the next Lockyer.
Black could be an elite 300+ gamer, as could Mozer or Cobbo or whoever. You need to take the punt on 2 or 3 though and not pay the whole team on potential.
Wasn’t that the idea behind the likes of Plath, Hosking, Hoeter, Baker, Palasia and Taupau, etc?
The first two there irritate me because they were legit fantastic players and we let them go but it is also a glaring example of three things in my opinion:
1. Our retention team is not proactive - this is the biggest issue
2. We do identify talent really well but we don’t move quick enough to keep them which links back to problem 1
3. Look at Palasia, Farnworth even and Hosking - any of our blokes who fill a role get exposure and then offers from other teams, heck even Sailor who has been useless has a multi-year deal from arguably the best club in the ESL
I feel like our talent scouts actually do a really good job, our lazy retention team lets them down.
What I would like to know is where the hold up happens. Is it the retention team level, is it at the senior management level or is it the board or whatever committee it is taking too long to approve offers?
Because this issue has been there since the previous regime, I’m inclined it is a rusted on staff member/s causing this to happen.