- Jan 25, 2013
- 25,619
- 29,899
No only XXXX... Can I still be a bogan?
I think the first part already confirmed the second part.
No only XXXX... Can I still be a bogan?
Excellent! Are you a bogan or are you far to proper?I think the first part already confirmed the second part.
Excellent! Are you a bogan or are you far to proper?
Good job mate, wear your mullet with pride, book that holiday to Bali and wear those bread clips on your thongsWay bogan. We swapped engines in our ride-on and cut the exhaust pipe off. I think that qualifies for Australian Of The Year just by itself.
Good job mate, wear your mullet with pride, book that holiday to Bali and wear those bread clips on your thongs
We do what we want mate we are bogans! ...no apologies sir, please continue telling us your legal knowledgeIf you bogans could go to another thread, that'd be great.
This week's 360 was an absolute broncos bashing. They're not usually that bad, but it was completely one sided this week.Rothfield is a sweaty prick. He is either diaphoretic due to alcohol withdrawals or from the filthy lies he spews from his mouth. The level of hatred toward the broncos on 360 is disgraceful. Lodge was treated worse then Packer. If he had signed elsewhere they would of given a redemption story.
Why would we need to ban him? He was never getting a game for the Broncos.This week's 360 was an absolute broncos bashing. They're not usually that bad, but it was completely one sided this week.
- Started with James Ackerman. There was some mention that NRL needs to take more responsibility and hand out larger suspensions, however they largely hammered broncos for basically not handing Molo an internal ban on his repeat offences
They were saying that the broncos should've done more after 2 more shoulder charge offences and indicated something along the lines of sitting him out.Why would we need to ban him? He was never getting a game for the Broncos.
They were saying that the broncos should've done more after 2 more shoulder charge offences and indicated something along the lines of sitting him out.
It's absolutely ludicrous to think there is anything the broncos could've done to prevent it happening though. They teach defence during training and I'm sure as shit it doesn't involve shoulder charging.
The real emphasis should be placed on the governing body to incorporate new sanctions around shoulder charges such as bigger suspensions. Penalties such as lengthy bans is the best deterrent.
I wasn't trying to claim anything, I said I never classed myself as one. But after further discussion I thought we came to a conclusion that I was and a fucking classy one at that? Nothing to be ashamed about mate.
What?Hey, we are all on a Broncos forum. Some people say that's enough to qualify. If it is I am happy to wear it.
I must have missed the show where Rothfield demanded the Sharks sit players/staff down for the whole disgraceful peptide saga.They were saying that the broncos should've done more after 2 more shoulder charge offences and indicated something along the lines of sitting him out.
It's absolutely ludicrous to think there is anything the broncos could've done to prevent it happening though. They teach defence during training and I'm sure as shit it doesn't involve shoulder charging.
The real emphasis should be placed on the governing body to incorporate new sanctions around shoulder charges such as bigger suspensions. Penalties such as lengthy bans is the best deterrent.
Between Gallen and Rothfield I am officially anti-sharks.