What I don't get is even if AS's hands are tied to keeping Boyd in first grade, why not put him somewhere like centre or wing where he may actually be of some use without being as much of a liability? Are AS's hands tied so much that he can't even choose his own player's positions in the team?
Yep simple enough. Make the fucking call the situation will not resolve by itself.I'm not a businessman, but I would assume that if you have an underperforming asset, you either reallocate the resource (q cup) or cut your losses (front load and let them walk).
I don't think following the course, which has proven to be an expensive and futile exercise, is a good business decision.
Very smart from Seibs to leak this to the press, assuming it's true.
When is White's next press conference? Should be a few tough questions to make him squirm.
I'd be surprised if Seibold didn't have total autonomy when it came to team selections.
I'd be surprised if Seibold didn't have total autonomy when it came to team selections.
This is what I am wondering as well (re any corroboration). It is so easy for some random to post things on social media and a lot of people lap it up and treat it like gospel (apologies for the use of that analogy Huge I am too tired to think of another).Agreed. It sounds too silly to be sane.
If confirmed, this club is going to be struggling for a long time.
Is there any corroborating evidence for this random tweet?
None. It's been mentioned three times, all by the same person. A person who has been known to regularly make shit up.Agreed. It sounds too silly to be sane.
If confirmed, this club is going to be struggling for a long time.
Is there any corroborating evidence for this random tweet?
Mmm, logic? No. Plausibility perhaps. It may be that management don't want the ugly image of a highly paid player, a player to whom they gave a top tier wage playing ISC.I agree with the last 3 posters except we all know Boyd should have been dropped by now.
Either siebs is a hopeless coach (and I don’t think he is) or he is being overruled by the broncos hierarchy.
Unpalatable as that tweet is it has a certain amount of logic to it.
Mmm, logic? No. Plausibility perhaps. It may be that management don't want the ugly image of a highly paid player, a player to whom they gave a top tier wage playing ISC.
It would look like mismanagement in a public company but even that doesn't mean it's logical they would or have kneecapped the coach. I mean that would be worse, giving him a 5 year deal and making him a lame duck, coach in name only bit player. I'd think that was an even worse look for the club.
ZzzzzzzzLol. Back in ya box seibold.