Daniel Anderson faces sack from the unhappy Eels

[Foordy]

that thing about sacking a coach after only 2 seasons is that it usually takes a coach at least 2 years to get the team they want. all coaches inherit their team and they have to wait for contracts to be up, either of players in their teams that they want to get rid of; or of players from other teams that they want to sign.

thats why i don't think clubs should ever sack a coach after 2 years. but let them get the team that they want first and then see how they go. also they team that coaches inherit is one that the previous coach has usually been sacked from and was performing poorly.

 

[Je$ter]

It has to have something to do with a racial slur, because if Parramatta thinks it is their coach that caused them to miss the 8 then they have nfi. I mean c'mon, Jeff Robson is your halfback and you expect to win games???

 

[Foordy]

It has to have something to do with a racial slur, because if Parramatta thinks it is their coach that caused them to miss the 8 then they have nfi. I mean c'mon, Jeff Robson is your halfback and you expect to win games???

what have they done that makes you think that they have ever had an idea [icon_lol1.

 

[Bucking Beads]

Rumours I have heard is that the Parra board thinks Daniel Anderson struggles to communicate with the young maori kids... [icon_shru

 

[Nashy]

Yeeep. Dunno why, but he couldn't move the Warriors forward after the final. They went from being great, to being the regular old great one game, terrible next Warriors.

 

[Bucking Beads]

They Sacked him!! Bloody knobs hahah Good old Parra.

 

[Fozz]

http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,865 ... 66,00.html

Parramatta Eels have sacked embattled coach Daniel Anderson at an emergency board meeting, ending speculation on the future of the embattled coach.

The meeting - originally scheduled for Tuesday night - was brought forward 48 hours after news of his likely dismal was leaked to the media over the weekend.

 

[Nashy]

Fucking idiots.

 

[Scorchie]

Fools, hope this means Quade will never go there now... [icon_thumbs_do

 

[Je$ter]

Rumours I have heard is that the Parra board thinks Daniel Anderson struggles to communicate with the young maori kids... [icon_shru

Maybe it's because they won't listen to him?

 

[Big Pete]

[eusa_doh What would Anderson achieve at the Broncos that Henjak couldn't?

 

[Porthoz]

[eusa_doh What would Anderson achieve at the Broncos that Henjak couldn't?

- Better defense to start with.
- More aggression in the forwards.
- Less brain farts such as Tunza at 5/8, Gillett as 5/8 and Te'o as prop (with alternatives available), therefore weakening our strongest sector.
- Maybe a few other set plays than the usual one we go for and is now pretty much universally known and prepared against by our adversaries.

But not if it's true that Anderson has "communication issues" though.

 

[Professor47]

This 'communication' issue is bullshit. Honestly the way they played was careless and with no heart. Sure - the coach may have some part it that but the players need to step up as well. Such is the nature of the job but I agree... sacking him now doesn't make sense. IMO clubs look for the short term too much... I think 3 yrs is right... 2 is harsh.

 

[Flutterby]

IMO clubs look for the short term too much...

^^^ this

IMO a lot "fans" are also guilty of this

 

[Raw Boned Youngster]

It is a sign of the times.
it is an 'instant' world.
Everyone wants it and now.
Paying your dues is unfortunately a beautiful old quality that is being morphed out of new humans.

Sad really - there are lots of great learning opportunities along the way.
It also reduces the blame mentality as well.

 

[lynx000]

[eusa_doh What would Anderson achieve at the Broncos that Henjak couldn't?

- Better defense to start with.
- More aggression in the forwards.
- Less brain farts such as Tunza at 5/8, Gillett as 5/8 and Te'o as prop (with alternatives available), therefore weakening our strongest sector.
- Maybe a few other set plays than the usual one we go for and is now pretty much universally known and prepared against by our adversaries.

But not if it's true that Anderson has "communication issues" though.

Anderson has been guilty of some brain farts as well, like trying to play Hayne at 5/8.

 

[The Brizz]

[eusa_doh What would Anderson achieve at the Broncos that Henjak couldn't?

- Better defense to start with.
- More aggression in the forwards.
- Less brain farts such as Tunza at 5/8, Gillett as 5/8 and Te'o as prop (with alternatives available), therefore weakening our strongest sector.
- Maybe a few other set plays than the usual one we go for and is now pretty much universally known and prepared against by our adversaries.

But not if it's true that Anderson has "communication issues" though.

Anderson has been guilty of some brain farts as well, like trying to play Hayne at 5/8.

You could understand what he was trying to do and he got it right (in attack at least) when he moved him to fullback. He needed to get Hayne more involved because he knew what he was capable of and no one had seen it yet to its massive potential. Hayne owes a lot of his massive contract upgrade to Anderson.

 

[Big Pete]

Better defense to start with.

And end with.

More aggression in the forwards.

Based on what?

Less brain farts such as Tunza at 5/8, Gillett as 5/8 and Te'o as prop (with alternatives available), therefore weakening our strongest sector.

:roll: Please. People overate those decisions so much. I'll concede Te'o was a silly decision but I couldn't blame him for Tunza and Gillett. Both players they were covering weren't ready.

- Maybe a few other set plays than the usual one we go for and is now pretty much universally known and prepared against by our adversaries.

[icon_lol1. oh yeah the Eels certainly showed some creativity in attack now didn't they. I agree with Henjak being a poor defensive coach, but attack is his forte and the Broncos are playing some of the best attacking footy since the 90's.

If we drop Henjak for Anderson, we're no better than Parramatta.