Danoz Direct
NRL Captain
- Oct 12, 2013
- 3,800
- 1,285
Mitch Marsh has to be dropped for the next test.
Disgraceful! The batsmen have no heart outside of one or two. The going started getting a little tough, a LITTLE in that they just had to gring out ten to fifteen overs but nope, too hard as it always is. Yes the SA bowling was good but they lost their spearhead and had a debutant in the attack who was getting smashed to all parts. Admittedly the Smith wicket was a what the moment from the ump and Neville was not out but that is the price of a stupid Watsonesque referral by Marsh. Just stupid cricket by guys who just have no sense of picking moments or showing fight. Bunch of high paid Prima donnas they are.
I feel sorry for our bowlers. They bowled brilliantly against SA to get a massive advantage that our middle order decided to throw away for nothing. If I were the four front line bowlers, I would be tearing strips off that middle order. And I'm a huge MMarsh fan but if you are going to keep dishing up that rubbish with the bat in your hand, get out of the team and come back as a front line bowler because right now, you are a waste of space.
Who comes in? Henriques is pretty much the same thing as MMarsh but with more mediocre batting. I'd be going with Head/Maxwell for no other reason than we have jack all pace all rounders at present since Faulkner has gone backwards in FC as well. And I'm sorry but Khawaja, if you want to have a go at selectors, at least come out and make a statement. I'm so grumpy now.
Rant over!!
That Smith decision was absolutely ridiculous. He was way too far down the pitch to be adjudged LBW.
Benefit of doubt goes with the batsman. You're saying there was no doubt? That's why that would rarely be given. Even ball tracking was with the margin of error.
Batsmen have built their technique around getting forward to the spinners for 100 years. I'm fine with it as long as it's consistent, which I doubt it will be. And while we're at it, let's get rid of the rule " can't be out if it pitches outside leg" It's pure discrimination against leggies.The benifit of the doubt is getting smaller and smaller. They'll fire you out then look to the proof.
Batsmen have built their technique around getting forward to the spinners for 100 years. I'm fine with it as long as it's consistent, which I doubt it will be. And while we're at it, let's get rid of the rule " can't be out if it pitches outside leg" It's pure discrimination against leggies.
Batsmen have built their technique around getting forward to the spinners for 100 years. I'm fine with it as long as it's consistent, which I doubt it will be. And while we're at it, let's get rid of the rule " can't be out if it pitches outside leg" It's pure discrimination against leggies.
Should never have been "given out" , and rarely would be historically, as there was too much doubt because of the distance the ball had to travel.If we want to use the technology we can't then abandon it when it gives a call we just don't like. People are complaining but his call yesterday was shown to be correct using the technology it would have hit the stumps.
That's out and should be out every time.