Alec
International Rep
- Mar 4, 2008
- 19,392
- 12,509
Maybe not, but he didn't even attempt to try to match them.
They would have certainly done a better job, and I'm sure they (and I) would've loved to at least give it a try!Which is apart of the reason he needs to go but then again, I couldn't see the likes of McGuire, Lawrence, Lillyman, Tolman etc being able to match it with the Kiwis pack.
They were just too good and the players that we needed like Mat Scott, Andrew Fifita, Drug Cheat etc. weren't available.
I thought David Klemmer performed admirably.
How do you know that? Do you have a crystal ball?Okay then, what would have your 24 man squad been if it was that obvious?
As far as I'm concerned, I read through most of the suggestions on here and all the players that were nominated were fringe rep players who would have been a marginal improvement if that.
Porthoz said:How do you know that? Do you have a crystal ball?
Porthoz said:allowing Parker and Thaiday to play in their preferred positions for example.
(although Lillyman is already a proven performer)
I'm talking about giving the Kiwis their chance to shine and celebrating their talents
Pfft ...**** that !
I equate the loss in the same vein as NSW beat QLD this year.
The Kiwis played a 3rd / 4th string Aus side
end of/
I seriously don't understand why Queenslanders are saying this. It wasn't a 3rd string Queensland team it was almost at full strength apart from Cronk and his replacement was DCE who is held in high regard by everyone. Also do Queenslanders think the 2013 win was nothing because NSW were not at full strength after game 1 and were more under strength then what Queensland ever were throughout this year, of course they don't they see it as another glorious chapter in their incredible winning streak.