Anonymous person
Banned User
- Dec 16, 2008
- 4,635
- 932
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
[eusa_clap.gi
[icon_lol1.Coxy said:
[eusa_clap.gi
Porthoz
International Captain
Senior Staff
- Feb 27, 2010
- 29,590
- 11,970
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
Yes, because Thaiday said so.Kaz said:
Kimlo
International Captain
Senior Staff
- Apr 26, 2008
- 34,580
- 35,552
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
LOOOOOOOL!
Thaiday ftw :D
LOOOOOOOL!
Thaiday ftw :D
Nashy
Immortal
Senior Staff
- Mar 5, 2008
- 54,417
- 34,689
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
What the **** is going on here?
What the **** is going on here?
Kaz
State of Origin Captain
- Mar 5, 2008
- 10,021
- 3,770
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
The way I understand it, they can change the contact.
Say Inglis is on $600,000 per year & the contract is 3 years, he can sign another contract that runs for 5 years.
So that means he is earning $360,00 per year.
The way I understand it, they can change the contact.
Say Inglis is on $600,000 per year & the contract is 3 years, he can sign another contract that runs for 5 years.
So that means he is earning $360,00 per year.
Porthoz
International Captain
Senior Staff
- Feb 27, 2010
- 29,590
- 11,970
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
That is what I would call a major pay cut and what the NRL according to Gallop, is not willing to do...Kaz said:
Donny
NRL Player
- Mar 31, 2010
- 1,110
- 96
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
From my understanding of what Gallop was saying he said that by the Strom paying massive over's for their players they have stopped any other club poaching them by offering them what their real NRL worth would be. Gallop said that it would be unfair now to allow the Storm to pay these players below their NRL worth and keep them when in the past other clubs would have made offers to them which would be worth more then the money they would be on if they took pay cuts.
It would be completely stupid if Melbourne players were able to all take pay cuts to stay with the Storm. Technically they would still have a team worth more then the salary cap!
Personally i would like to see the NRL say, Rite Melbourne you now have to honour the contracts of the big four. They can not take cuts in their salary and what ever ones you choose to keep you have to pay them what they have been getting payed for the past 4 years. So if they choose Slater, Smith & Cronk and each of them have been payed 600k a year then that would be 1.8mil gone out of the cap. This is your punishment now you have to try and establish a NRL team with the remaining 2.4mil. Once their contracts have expired then you may negotiate a lower price to be able to fit them into the cap better and pay them their actually NRL price.
Have Fun Cheats
audragon said:
From my understanding of what Gallop was saying he said that by the Strom paying massive over's for their players they have stopped any other club poaching them by offering them what their real NRL worth would be. Gallop said that it would be unfair now to allow the Storm to pay these players below their NRL worth and keep them when in the past other clubs would have made offers to them which would be worth more then the money they would be on if they took pay cuts.
It would be completely stupid if Melbourne players were able to all take pay cuts to stay with the Storm. Technically they would still have a team worth more then the salary cap!
Personally i would like to see the NRL say, Rite Melbourne you now have to honour the contracts of the big four. They can not take cuts in their salary and what ever ones you choose to keep you have to pay them what they have been getting payed for the past 4 years. So if they choose Slater, Smith & Cronk and each of them have been payed 600k a year then that would be 1.8mil gone out of the cap. This is your punishment now you have to try and establish a NRL team with the remaining 2.4mil. Once their contracts have expired then you may negotiate a lower price to be able to fit them into the cap better and pay them their actually NRL price.
Have Fun Cheats
S
spanky
NYC Player
- Apr 2, 2010
- 152
- 9
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
Apparently the Greg Inglis negotiations are back on and he could sign on monday
Apparently the Greg Inglis negotiations are back on and he could sign on monday
schmix
NRL Player
- Mar 4, 2008
- 2,799
- 33
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
Moving this to Broncos talk because some people can't seem to be able to find it in league talk. If it turns out he stays with Melbourne I'll move it back.
Moving this to Broncos talk because some people can't seem to be able to find it in league talk. If it turns out he stays with Melbourne I'll move it back.
A
Aeetee
State of Origin Rep
- Mar 4, 2008
- 5,617
- 132
- Thread starter
- #388
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
He already signed, it all smoke and mirrors. He signed last week, hes playing next year. And the media and footy clubs like to draw shit out for there own amusment.
Woo hoo... go greg go :)
He already signed, it all smoke and mirrors. He signed last week, hes playing next year. And the media and footy clubs like to draw shit out for there own amusment.
Woo hoo... go greg go :)
L
Locky24
QCup Player
- May 17, 2009
- 526
- 380
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
i so hope you right!! _woohoo_ _woohoo_
Aeetee said:
i so hope you right!! _woohoo_ _woohoo_
pennywisealfie
State of Origin Captain
Contributor
- Mar 4, 2008
- 10,547
- 5,378
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
Lets go Inglis!!!!!!!
Lets go Inglis!!!!!!!
pennywisealfie
State of Origin Captain
Contributor
- Mar 4, 2008
- 10,547
- 5,378
pennywisealfie
State of Origin Captain
Contributor
- Mar 4, 2008
- 10,547
- 5,378
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
Gotta give MASSIVE credit to Andrew Gee and Bruno Cullen for staying firm with the 400k!
Gotta give MASSIVE credit to Andrew Gee and Bruno Cullen for staying firm with the 400k!
Kris
State of Origin Captain
- Mar 4, 2008
- 8,374
- 142
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
I peed a little.
I peed a little.
schmix
NRL Player
- Mar 4, 2008
- 2,799
- 33
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
When the whole Storm thing blew up, I said I'd prefer Slater to Inglis because I think he offers much better value in terms of consistent effort and performance. I still believe this, but with Hoffman's form and Hodges' injury troubles, I think Inglis is probably a better fit for the Broncos at the moment.
I just hope it's not a two year stay and then off to somewhere else for him. I want someone who is committed to the club and plans to stick around for the long haul.
When the whole Storm thing blew up, I said I'd prefer Slater to Inglis because I think he offers much better value in terms of consistent effort and performance. I still believe this, but with Hoffman's form and Hodges' injury troubles, I think Inglis is probably a better fit for the Broncos at the moment.
I just hope it's not a two year stay and then off to somewhere else for him. I want someone who is committed to the club and plans to stick around for the long haul.
Donny
NRL Player
- Mar 31, 2010
- 1,110
- 96
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
My thinking is that Lockyer probally only has two more years so me MAY get an upgrade when Lockyer retires......
schmix said:
My thinking is that Lockyer probally only has two more years so me MAY get an upgrade when Lockyer retires......
Kris
State of Origin Captain
- Mar 4, 2008
- 8,374
- 142
Re: Greg Inglis walks away from...
I agree, schmix.
It will be massive kick in the pants for Hoffman (who's going great guns for us) if we sign Slater. We need Inglis more than Slater as Hodges is always injured and we won't have Folau next year.
Inglis is still pretty young so there's a chance that he won't be a Bronco for life. That is, if he REALLY signed with us.
schmix said:
I agree, schmix.
It will be massive kick in the pants for Hoffman (who's going great guns for us) if we sign Slater. We need Inglis more than Slater as Hodges is always injured and we won't have Folau next year.
Inglis is still pretty young so there's a chance that he won't be a Bronco for life. That is, if he REALLY signed with us.
