B
broncosil
QCup Player
- Mar 31, 2008
- 428
- 0
Have to agree with Beads and Nashy. Why are the morals of the men involved questioned when those of the women aren't? These women went willingly back to the hotel room or a public toilet (which just screams class) but their morals aren't questioned at all.
In fact why are judging peoples morals anyway? What one may consider acceptable some may not. Group sex has been going on for thousands of years. In fact the Romans and Egyptians were well known for it. I have seen documentaries on primates engaging in group sex, oral sex, anal sex, homosexuality etc all of which are considered immoral by certain parts of society.
To me, if you know what you are doing and it is consensual (and it is in both the case of Hunt and Johns) then the only person you have to answer to is yourself and your partner. That's it.
These women are making many allegations without proof. They are destroying the careers of those they have named. Maybe a defamation of character suit should be in order.
In fact why are judging peoples morals anyway? What one may consider acceptable some may not. Group sex has been going on for thousands of years. In fact the Romans and Egyptians were well known for it. I have seen documentaries on primates engaging in group sex, oral sex, anal sex, homosexuality etc all of which are considered immoral by certain parts of society.
To me, if you know what you are doing and it is consensual (and it is in both the case of Hunt and Johns) then the only person you have to answer to is yourself and your partner. That's it.
These women are making many allegations without proof. They are destroying the careers of those they have named. Maybe a defamation of character suit should be in order.