ronnyd said:I don't think you can really argue with Johns inclusion, how old were guys when sterlo retired? Can't of seem much of him and play and been old enough to really judge him. Johns was voted by a jury of his footballing peers, who would have get so see both of them in their prime. The judges clearly weren't biased players fresh in their mind either.
Well the only truly "fresh" players in the list were Langer, Webcke, Lockyer and Johns. All the other players had masses of hugely talented players in their positions.
Johns' reputation has blown so huge he was always going to win, even though in my opinion his actual deeds don't match the aura with which he's received.