Fozz said:Incidently as far as I'm concerned I don't care how much Izzy is paid, if he's better on the wing then play him there.
Fozz said:He played there last year. Also when Hodges was out.
Fozz said:I don't see why centre pairings are important? They play on the opposite side of the field. Centre-winger, yes but centre-centre?
Izzy was good enough when Hodges was out, no reason why he can't be when Hodges is in.
Susan said:Now we have an excuse to drop him because we lost.
He was no worse than the rest of the team but farrk, he has not improved one bit.
rnabokov said:Fozz said:I don't see why centre pairings are important? They play on the opposite side of the field. Centre-winger, yes but centre-centre?
Izzy was good enough when Hodges was out, no reason why he can't be when Hodges is in.
Yes, but that's the whole point. You have 2 class centres on opposite sides of the field, so 2 key attacking options across the whole field rather than on 1 side.
Fozz said:rnabokov said:Fozz said:I don't see why centre pairings are important? They play on the opposite side of the field. Centre-winger, yes but centre-centre?
Izzy was good enough when Hodges was out, no reason why he can't be when Hodges is in.
Yes, but that's the whole point. You have 2 class centres on opposite sides of the field, so 2 key attacking options across the whole field rather than on 1 side.
Uhh...seems we agree then?
Susan said:rnabokov said:Susan said:Now we have an excuse to drop him because we lost.
He was no worse than the rest of the team but farrk, he has not improved one bit.
And if we are still, in theory, experimenting with an ideal configuration, then maybe it is time for Izzy to have a go as centre and shift Michaels to the wing.
Yeah agreed totally. But then again, Yow Yeh seems like a better wing than Michaels would so maybe promote Yow Yeh? Either way, Michaels is a shit centre.
andirect said:why would you run towards the sideline in those conditions?
broncospwn said:Micheals needs to be sacked ASAP, and the "never change a winning team" argument doesn't apply here.