L
langer77
QCup Player
- Jul 19, 2010
- 305
- 0
Langer got my vote
Jeba said:See them walk out onto the field, there is no jumping around, clapping the hands and yelling come on boys, they just sum up the situation and wait to release the energy after the whistle blows. I'm not saying it's no good to be fired up, but that just typifies those two players to me - they just want their football to do the talking, and they back it up with great attention to detail on the field.
Flutterby said:The poll needs to define "modern era" better.
For mine Lewis is the greatest player I have ever seen play, but I don't consider him to be a player of the modern era - it has been almost 20 years since he retired (same goes for Mal, don't think he belongs in the poll either due to the era thing).
When it comes to the modern era, if I take sentiment out of it completely and was 100% honest, I'd have to say Johns just edges Lockyer (as much as it pains me to say it).
mrslong said:I would take Darren Lockyer 2006 over Andrew Johns 2005 tbph.
Scotty said:In the discussion of this article on foxsports, it's amazing how many idiots are using Lockyers defense as a reason why Johns is better than him. If you want to compary the two then you have to factor in all aspects of their games and in Lockyers case, his abilities at both 5/8 AND fullback. And at fullback, as far as I'm concerned, you couldn't get a better defender.
in defence, Lockyer sucked 1-on-1, then was the best 1-on-1 defender ive ever seen, then went back to pretty poor when he switched to 5/8th.Big Pete said:Maybe not in 2003 but before then Lockyer would often get beaten before the cover defence would allow him to recover.
im not sure that you actually know what charisma is if you think that it was Lockyers charisma that led us to the 2006 premiership [icon_lol1.Porthoz said:Locky has something that Johns lacks IMO: Charisma!
It wasn't just some individual brilliance that led us to the 2006 title, it was Locky's leadership and charisma. And of course, the ability to think and execute flawlessly under pressure, that produced so many victories when it mattered most.
Anonymous person said:im not sure that you actually know what charisma is if you think that it was Lockyers charisma that led us to the 2006 premiership [icon_lol1.Porthoz said:Locky has something that Johns lacks IMO: Charisma!
It wasn't just some individual brilliance that led us to the 2006 title, it was Locky's leadership and charisma. And of course, the ability to think and execute flawlessly under pressure, that produced so many victories when it mattered most.