THE COACH Kevin Walters

[Sproj]

They're lurking on BHQ again.

Of course, @McHunt makes no secret of being on here.

 

[McHunt]

The context is it's with hindsight, this isn't even news if Broncos didn't drop off a cliff after that was aired and Tyson wasn't playing when that happened.

It's complete over reaction and finger pointing.

They're reacting the same way I did when you posted it. It's always newsworthy when a player drops his guard and speaks openly. It's a rare commodity these days. All these players are media trained, given talking points and chaperoned to and from press conference. After games, they blurt out the same tired platitudes you've heard a million times from every other player.

This interview was pure gold. Full credit to you for posting it, and to all the boys for their comments.

 

[Santa]

Wasn't Bennet also known not to be a very technical coach (and more around managing the man)? I don't think it's so bad if the coach isn't planning every detail and more focused on attitude and culture.

 

[Mustafur]

Wasn't Bennet also known not to be a very technical coach (and more around managing the man)? I don't think it's so bad if the coach isn't planning every detail and more focused on attitude and culture.

I pointed this out before, Bennett is as non technical as it comes with even more questionable squad pick decisions, often risking player injury to get them out early and not using the 17th player and or having an outside back on the bench, he has done it for as long as I have watched us.

While there is very different technical approaches to coaching that some pick, others don't even go the technical path and go towards the player psyche path like him, to me it looks on the surface that Kevvie has based his philosophy around that and why not, Bennett was his coach for almost his entire first grade Career.

the big problem with that path is Bennett has his reputation to go on, Kevvie doesn't have that luxury so players see an inexperienced coach doing something extremely oddball that only a former Bennett player can probably understand, I think this is probably a reason he won Reyno over.

Back in the day when Bennett was starting it wouldn't of been such a hard sell I would think.

 

[Foordy]

Fox Sports have linked Gambles comments to Kevvie's contract situation

 

[Mustafur]

Fox Sports have linked Gambles comments to Kevvie's contract situation

Of course they have lmao, did we need any more proof that they are a bunch of clowns.

 

[Johnny92]

I pointed this out before, Bennett is as non technical as it comes with even more questionable squad pick decisions, often risking player injury to get them out early and not using the 17th player and or having an outside back on the bench, he has done it for as long as I have watched us.

While there is very different technical approaches to coaching that some pick, others don't even go the technical path and go towards the player psyche path like him, to me it looks on the surface that Kevvie has based his philosophy around that and why not, Bennett was his coach for almost his entire first grade Career.

the big problem with that path is Bennett has his reputation to go on, Kevvie doesn't have that luxury so players see an inexperienced coach doing something extremely oddball that only a former Bennett player can probably understand, I think this is probably a reason he won Reyno over.

Back in the day when Bennett was starting it wouldn't of been such a hard sell I would think.

And guys like Gamble and majority of players in the squad wouldn't of ever had a playmaker in the team whose capable of being the master mind in the attack.
Your playmakers who are capable of it should have this control over how the teams play.

 

[Johnny92]

‘Out of line’: Broncos skipper responds to Gamble’s bombshell Kevvie claims

‘Out of line’: Broncos skipper responds to Gamble’s bombshell Kevvie claims

www.foxsports.com.au

 

[Mustafur]

And guys like Gamble and majority of players in the squad wouldn't of ever had a playmaker in the team whose capable of being the master mind in the attack.
Your playmakers who are capable of it should have this control over how the teams play.

The way I see it why not, if a coach doesn't input anything off a player that is in the thick of it and has plenty of experience in big games etc why wouldn't you, I mean all the coaches in the game are ex players afterall.

 

[Foordy]

‘Out of line’: Broncos skipper responds to Gamble’s bombshell Kevvie claims

‘Out of line’: Broncos skipper responds to Gamble’s bombshell Kevvie claims

www.foxsports.com.au

strong endorsement of Kevvie from the skipper

 

[Super Freak]

strong endorsement of Kevvie from the skipper

It's what they're not saying that's the issue here. Kevvie is a great bloke, passionate guy, but that's all they're saying about him. They aren't talking about how good he is at studying the opposition team, finding weaknesses and creating a gameplan to target those weaknesses or anything like that.

They're just talking about what a good bloke he is.

 

[Mustafur]

It's what they're not saying that's the issue here. Kevvie is a great bloke, passionate guy, but that's all they're saying about him. They aren't talking about how good he is at studying the opposition team, finding weaknesses and creating a gameplan to target those weaknesses or anything like that.

They're just talking about what a good bloke he is.

The never satisfied don't need answers though.

 

[MrRobot]

To be honest, nothing in the Gamble interview makes me think any less of Kevvie. Other fans may want something different but I’m happy for him to lead the football team like a manager and leave the technical attack and defence structures to the assistants and senior playmakers. Everyone has their strengths.

If anything, perhaps we need at least one younger, more technically minded assistant coach.

 

[theshed]

To be honest, nothing in the Gamble interview makes me think any less of Kevvie. Other fans may want something different but I’m happy for him to lead the football team like a manager and leave the technical attack and defence structures to the assistants and senior playmakers. Everyone has their strengths.

If anything, perhaps we need at least one younger, more technically minded assistant coach.

Yeah it’s one thing for Kev to not be running the attack but you have to ask wtf the assistance do.

 

[Johnny92]

It's what they're not saying that's the issue here. Kevvie is a great bloke, passionate guy, but that's all they're saying about him. They aren't talking about how good he is at studying the opposition team, finding weaknesses and creating a gameplan to target those weaknesses or anything like that.

They're just talking about what a good bloke he is.

Cameron Smith and Denan Kemp touched on this on their podcast today.
In short Smith said - I was coached by Kevvie in origin and he did a fantastic job there, different environment but he was apart of the game plan building, he was apart of previewing opposition and breaking down weaknesses and says it's strange Tyson has come out and said this.

 

[theshed]

Cameron Smith and Denan Kemp touched on this on their podcast today.
In short Smith said - I was coached by Kevvie in origin and he did a fantastic job there, different environment but he was apart of the game plan building, he was apart of previewing opposition and breaking down weaknesses and says it's strange Tyson has come out and said this.

I heard that and maybe it’s just reading too much into things but I thought it was strange that he kept saying “part of”, not “good at” or anything like that - he was just part of it. He didn’t say anything to talk up Kev’s knowledge or ability.

I bet no one would refer to Billy as being “part of” the game plan building at origin this year

 

[MrRobot]

Yeah it’s one thing for Kev to not be running the attack but you have to ask wtf the assistance do.

Yeah, I agree. Personally I think Cartwright and Matterson are too similar. Similar age, era, personality etc.

Could have done with someone like a Trent Barrett or Ciraldo type.

 

[pagey]

I heard that and maybe it’s just reading too much into things but I thought it was strange that he kept saying “part of”, not “good at” or anything like that - he was just part of it. He didn’t say anything to talk up Kev’s knowledge or ability.

I bet no one would refer to Billy as being “part of” the game plan building at origin this year

he said he did a fantastic job?
Billy had Smith, Thurston and others helping him !