Foordy
International Captain
Contributor
- Mar 4, 2008
- 34,743
- 41,409
I didn't see the Storm game, but FTR, Hunt received a 4/10 in the RLW player ratings
I didn't see the Storm game, but FTR, Hunt received a 4/10 in the RLW player ratings
Objectively Wallace was given a chance to develop correctly at the Panthers, Hunt on the otherhand wasn't even given the opportunity to develop from the Under 20's to the Queensland Cup at a time he showed real potential, instead of correctly developing him through the Queensland Cup in the position his best suited they instead rushed him into first grade into a position that wasn't best suited for him and that can have an impact on a players development. The difference between Wallace and Hunt is this, Wallace hasn't improved since joining the club and for the money his commanding I expect a lot more from him then I would Hunt or even Norman and Fourex knows my feelings on him lol, Hunt has shown promise when he has played in the halves and warrants an opportunity to show his wares there, if he fails to deliver fine, but I'd rather see him given an opportunity then continue the same path that for years now has delivered squat.
I didn't see the Storm game, but FTR, Hunt received a 4/10 in the RLW player ratings
I take your point but do we really want to be trying to develop a player that hasn't shown anything why here that's his own fault or the clubs? I still say the issue gets clouded when Wallace gets included in the discussion - he wouldn't get another contract from me if I was signing them
And if all three players weren't at the club next year I'd be happy. But if I had to pick one to stay it'd be Wallace
I was told the halfback does all the organizing.
But I find it hard to believe that Wallace was the one doing all the organizing and not Lockyer.
Would hurt so bad to lose a player with creativity and attacking potential, lucky we don't have to worry about that happening right now