Anonymous person
Banned User
- Dec 16, 2008
- 4,635
- 932
wallace may be the best this season but he should be, hes had that job for 6 seasons now. he has shown pretty much zero improvement in those 6 years. hes slow, has no vision, and cant attack his way out of a wet paper bag. the flak is deserved because hes no good.See, that's my biggest problem right there: Operating under the assumption that Hunt would be better than Wallace.
I know the latter isn't flashy, but he's nowhere near as bad as people paint him and he has been the best "spine" player so far this season, yet he cops the brunt of the flak.
What if Hunt turned out to be a bigger dud than Wallace? Would you start asking for Griffin, Gee and White's head?
McCullough on the other hand escapes relatively unscathed, and we have a bigger issue at hooker than in the halves at the moment.
if hunt turns out to be a bigger dud then wallace, we're really no worse off. we're not winning with wallace. at least hunt has time on his side to improve. wallace ISNT getting better, he has peaked.
i already am starting to want griffin, gee and whites heads for the way theyve handled the club over the last 12 months in everything from recruitment to team selection to gameplan. we're a club thats acting like we're untouchable on the top of the pile, when we're really languishing down the middle/bottom end of the pile.
i would love a better hooker, but hooker is the least of our problems IMO. a hooker can get the half all the service in the world, but after 5 years of watching wallace get the ball with 10m between him and the defence, on 5th tackle, and just ummm and ahhh for 5-6 seconds before getting tackled with the ball, its not the hooker thats the problem. you can win without a great hooker. you cant win without a great half.