W
WASSHHH
Guest
- Aug 24, 2017
- 4,083
- 10,248
You can focus on whatever finite point you like in a petty, immature and condescending way to try and argue your point, but fundamentally your point was wrong.Especially in a system where half the teams qualify
Especially in a system where half the teams qualify
Especially in a system where half the teams qualify
None of those coaches listed had those teams had built those teams either. So Green both built his team for years prior, and participated in a system where it was easier to make the finals.
Once a great coach has established his team, he's established. He might miss a finals because of circumstances, but not 3 in a row of a team he built. Not ever. More than likely that coach was carried by his team and on field leadership more than anything.
The Wayne Bennett example is with two different teams as well??? and it looked like Gibson was done after those 3 years. So..yeah..
You stated no good coaches had missed the finals 3 years in a row and then put a myriad of caveats against it to hedge your bets.
1910 rightly pointed out that the two most decorated coaches and who most consider to be the very best did just that. One at the beginning of the career, the other at the end.
You’re welcome to try and keep arguing it on the conditions of whatever caveats you like, but don’t expect a response from me.