NZWarriors.com
NZWarriors.com User
Contributor
- May 19, 2021
- 7,066
- 2,236
[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"]
[/st_td_row][st_td]snake77 - nzwarriors.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .July 12, 2013
MESSAGES: 10,489
REACTIONS: 19,730[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]
Every year the safest pick for the Warriors is 9-12 as we tend to usually be mid table and our top 8 hopes are often dashed in the last few weeks. If the journalists and Rothfield in particular did their homework that's where they'd be picking us most years.
Always picks the Sharks. This year he has them as big improvers and his reasoning is because they have signed a few players. Pretty much every team's fans can use that reasoning. Other years it's Sharks top 8 or premiership and they end up close to the spoon. Most journalists are either neutral or you need to listen hard to see which sides they have a soft spot for.
MESSAGES: 10,489
REACTIONS: 19,730[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]
His picks always have two themes. He never rates the Warriors or forgets about us so picks us last and then comes us with a reason to justify it.Soon as Buzz mentioned us for the spoon I threw a fiddy on us for the 8.
Every year the safest pick for the Warriors is 9-12 as we tend to usually be mid table and our top 8 hopes are often dashed in the last few weeks. If the journalists and Rothfield in particular did their homework that's where they'd be picking us most years.
Always picks the Sharks. This year he has them as big improvers and his reasoning is because they have signed a few players. Pretty much every team's fans can use that reasoning. Other years it's Sharks top 8 or premiership and they end up close to the spoon. Most journalists are either neutral or you need to listen hard to see which sides they have a soft spot for.