NSW Team
- Thread starter ningnangnong
- Start date
- Status
Broncoman
State of Origin Rep
- Oct 9, 2011
- 7,691
- 1,118
Can I have a link please BB?.
Bucking Beads
International Captain
- Mar 5, 2008
- 24,608
- 7,911
Try google.
- Mar 4, 2008
- 35,039
- 41,885
dukey
NRL Player
- Jun 5, 2008
- 2,961
- 204
I haven't seen Carney play this year, so I can't comment on his form; but overall, as a player, I rate him ahead of Soward. If Carney's to be in the team, it should be at the expense of Soward, not at his side.
Bucking Beads
International Captain
- Mar 5, 2008
- 24,608
- 7,911
I agree! NSW have plenty of halves and backs that are equally ****.
dukey
NRL Player
- Jun 5, 2008
- 2,961
- 204
Why is the word filter censoring "great"?
Broncoman
State of Origin Rep
- Oct 9, 2011
- 7,691
- 1,118
How come Mitchell Pearce is selected all the time. Yeah he can be well organised and can spark something from nothing, from time to time. But in the 5 or 6 origins his played NSW have only won 1. I think it's his relationship with Stuart. Ricky is a huge fan of him. Thoughts ?
Alec
International Rep
- Mar 4, 2008
- 19,413
- 12,537
For some reason people rate him highly. I still think he's a long way off. Like I said in another thread, he is NSW's golden boy.
Broncoman
State of Origin Rep
- Oct 9, 2011
- 7,691
- 1,118
I asked this question based on that post. I don't mind him but there are better players to pick.
Thing is if you pick Wallace you can't pick Soward. You'd basically have 2 organisers who require lots of structure without any natural playmaking instinct. They won't produce that spark that will make something happen - even less so with Hayne's poor form/lack of confidence.
If you pick Wallace you need someone like Carney alongside him.
That's not to say Pearce is better than Wallace, but I do think he is capable of that game breaking play more than Wallace is.
If you pick Wallace you need someone like Carney alongside him.
That's not to say Pearce is better than Wallace, but I do think he is capable of that game breaking play more than Wallace is.
1. Dugan (Stewart if he isn't fit)
2. Hayne
3. Jennings
4. J.Morris (far better form than Lawrence)
5. Uate
6. Mullen
7. Wallace
8. Snowden
9. Buderus
10. Tamou
11. Lewis
12. Gallen
13. Stewart
14. Leroyd-Lahrs
15. Scott
16. T.Sims/T.Williams
17. Hinchcliffe (as hooker backup, spare halve and a very solid backrow option)
Gallen to play prop as the game wears on, I think that pack could.match ours very easily and with form halves that backline gets a chance.
2. Hayne
3. Jennings
4. J.Morris (far better form than Lawrence)
5. Uate
6. Mullen
7. Wallace
8. Snowden
9. Buderus
10. Tamou
11. Lewis
12. Gallen
13. Stewart
14. Leroyd-Lahrs
15. Scott
16. T.Sims/T.Williams
17. Hinchcliffe (as hooker backup, spare halve and a very solid backrow option)
Gallen to play prop as the game wears on, I think that pack could.match ours very easily and with form halves that backline gets a chance.
Bucking Beads
International Captain
- Mar 5, 2008
- 24,608
- 7,911
So on form you think Mullen is playing better than Carney?? Wallace should be first half picked but odds of that happening are slim IMO.
I don't think Carney looks more creative than Mullen not even close, Carney and Wallace wouldn't scare QLD also it is a right right kicking pairing. Carney is playing well but isnt opening sides up or winning his team matches himself, Mullen right now has been dominant and especially in Gidleys absense is showing he can be the go to man for a team.
- Status
Unread
-
-
-
-
The one thing Michael Maguire won’t do after dominant Broncos win- Latest: Mick_Hancock
