Dirty like what? Try and offer more money?
[OFFICIAL] Anthony Milford to Broncos
- Thread starter Big Pete
- Start date
- Status
broncos4life
International Captain
- Oct 5, 2011
- 26,477
- 27,135
bullying, guilt, killing bunny rabbits... who knows?
She could convince me to do anything !!!!
- Jun 12, 2013
- 14,107
- 17,431
She could not convince me to keep my pants on tbh.....
Not right, that clause isn't in every contract and plenty don't have it.
You don't need it.
What clause, I didn't mention one or do you mean get out by round 13? That's not a clause but a generic NRL rule isn't it to give existing clubs the best chance to retain their talent?
No new contracts can be registered until round 13 only extensions can be.
Papa wasnt the first to use it and won't be the last, Raiders were bitten by it a couple of years earlier.
No new contracts can be registered until round 13 only extensions can be.
Papa wasnt the first to use it and won't be the last, Raiders were bitten by it a couple of years earlier.
Last edited:
It's not a standard clause and managers have it removed and or not included.
It's a standard NRL rule in their contracts section, managers might try and write a contract to make it null and void though I guess but since a contract can't be registered before then it'd be interesting to see what would happen. A manager would be crazy to to do that though potentially reducing his and his players pay.
It's not standard and you don't have to have it. Plenty of players don't have the clause they can jump before round 13.
Check the NRL contract rules dude, it's considered as much of a loophole as a clause due to not registering before round 13.
Do you agree the NRL won't register a contract with a new club before round 13 but will an extension? If so there's the loophole players can use to escape.
With what happened with Papa and Eels do you really think they would've allowed it to be added to Normans contract and stress over him coming?
Do you agree the NRL won't register a contract with a new club before round 13 but will an extension? If so there's the loophole players can use to escape.
With what happened with Papa and Eels do you really think they would've allowed it to be added to Normans contract and stress over him coming?
Last edited:
I've got no idea what you just said.
I'll explain it very clearly- the clause in contracts that allows players to change their mind up till half way through the year can be removed. Managers and players have it removed.
Do you really think Smith needs till round 13 of the year to see if he likes playing for the Storm after he signs?
Do you really think Parker says I'll sign but just give me till round 13 I might not like playing for the Broncos?
Some players/managers leave it in- because to be honest I suspect they're unsure or it's just there and it's not taken out.
- Jul 7, 2013
- 3,536
- 7,666
The masculine definition of his sentences and the forceful nature of his keystrokes are dead giveaways.
Financeguy
NRL Player
- Apr 24, 2013
- 2,093
- 3,322
I don't think bushy is talking about a clause after the player has already moved.
In his example we would sign Milford for the 2015 season on say the 1st of November 2013. We as fans could jump up and down with delight but due to the NRL not recognising the contract or approving it or whatever until round 13 in 2014, Milford could at the start of round 12 or earlier in 2014 tell the Broncos he has changed his mind and will stay at the Raiders.
I believe this is what happened with Josh Papali and Parra, and why we were all so desperate for round 13 to start with Corey Norman as we did not want the Broncos making a last ditch attempt to keep him.
- Status
