I dont care about the rule breaking as noted earlier, I care about the how.
If it is simple as a clause in anthonys favour that he can activate a get out whenever he likes, he could activate it and sign the broncs for 2014 no worries. But as everyone on here can see, he has not done that, presumably because he requires the raiders consent, which they have not given.
As for how the broncos learnt of such a clause, you tell me, I would assume that his manager told the same to the broncos? But right now who knows?
I hope you enjoyed your little cross examination, but to repeat it is not milford leaving, it is the cocklemammy story surrounding it perpetuated and encouraged by the broncos organisation.
Cross examination? Hehe, that's a good one!
So...
You don't know who, if anyone, told the Broncos about the clause.
You don't know the contents of the clause, only that the Raiders refuse to honor it, despite Anthony's request to activate it via his manager.
You have evidence of other onderhand dealings from the Raiders organisation.
You have quotes from Anthony and his manager about their anger at the Raiders refusal to honor that clause and that he won't go back to Canberra.
You have overwhelming evidence about the Raiders mis-management, and dodgy contract dealings (Dayne Weston, Josh Papalii, Ricky Stuart).
You have absolutely not a single shred of evidence or even a quote from the Broncos about this whole issue, except Paul White saying that at this point, the Broncos are spectators on the side line.
Yet you affirm that this is a cocklemammy story perpetuated and encouraged by the Broncos organisation!
If any attorney even dreamed of a conclusive case, you've just presented it! :laugh: