Player Movements & Rumours 2010
- Thread starter BroncoMatt
- Start date
- Status
Coxy said:
Actually, I was thinking the same thing about you, and I'm sure others would agree with me. Your opinion is logical most times (even if I disagree), but this whole Wallace thing is absurd. Maybe it is time for you to give it up and stop hijacking every thread with it.
noisetheory
NRL Captain
- Mar 31, 2008
- 4,084
- 1,079
8-)
- Mar 5, 2008
- 21,911
- 3,933
A little late dude.
broncos777
NYC Player
- Apr 6, 2010
- 103
- 0
Um may we please get back on topic hear?!
Raw Boned Youngster
QCup Player
- Mar 9, 2008
- 496
- 121
I rate Wallace very highly in terms of his footy brain.
He is a very clever player who relies on the timing of his forwards and the lines that they run.
His defensive contribution is a huge part of our improved defence.
He knows how to put a player into a hole and he has an intelligent kicking game.
The Hunt situation reminds me of the hooker who was given he 'next superstar' kiss of death.
He was the little fellow whose name escapes me.
That is the point.
Hunt may become something but he may also join that huge club of players who find the hype overwhelming - the Little hooker etc.
Wallace is a very important and valuable asset to the structure of the Broncos on many levels.
Hunt's role, off the bench, is perfect for his development - game time without the burden of responsibility.
Wallace is fine.
Let's accept it and move on.
He is a very clever player who relies on the timing of his forwards and the lines that they run.
His defensive contribution is a huge part of our improved defence.
He knows how to put a player into a hole and he has an intelligent kicking game.
The Hunt situation reminds me of the hooker who was given he 'next superstar' kiss of death.
He was the little fellow whose name escapes me.
That is the point.
Hunt may become something but he may also join that huge club of players who find the hype overwhelming - the Little hooker etc.
Wallace is a very important and valuable asset to the structure of the Broncos on many levels.
Hunt's role, off the bench, is perfect for his development - game time without the burden of responsibility.
Wallace is fine.
Let's accept it and move on.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 21,911
- 3,933
Raw Boned Youngster said:
Not sure I agree about his intelligent kicking game.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 21,911
- 3,933
The Rock said:
Not sure I agree about his intelligent kicking game.[/quote:1xsl5cgq]
Really? Watch more games then champion. His long kicking game has lacked a bit this year (as has Lockyer's at times, it also doesn't help when your pack has been dominated for half the year either) but his short kicking game has been pretty good as it usually is.[/quote:1xsl5cgq]
I saw enough of his so called intelligent kicking game on Sunday, repeated bombs getting kicked to wingers that were way to deep.
Raw Boned Youngster
QCup Player
- Mar 9, 2008
- 496
- 121
Listen o' Bucking One, even the great one has been guilty of that... and he has done that on days other than Sunday as well.
Jeba
International
- Mar 4, 2008
- 6,501
- 244
Bucking Beads said:
Not sure I agree about his intelligent kicking game.[/quote:2fs4r64l]
Really? Watch more games then champion. His long kicking game has lacked a bit this year (as has Lockyer's at times, it also doesn't help when your pack has been dominated for half the year either) but his short kicking game has been pretty good as it usually is.[/quote:2fs4r64l]
I saw enough of his so called intelligent kicking game on Sunday, repeated bombs getting kicked to wingers that were way to deep.[/quote:2fs4r64l]
Sunday was a game of field position mate. Not much was on all day.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 21,911
- 3,933
Jeba said:
Really? Watch more games then champion. His long kicking game has lacked a bit this year (as has Lockyer's at times, it also doesn't help when your pack has been dominated for half the year either) but his short kicking game has been pretty good as it usually is.[/quote:yj1cidte]
I saw enough of his so called intelligent kicking game on Sunday, repeated bombs getting kicked to wingers that were way to deep.[/quote:yj1cidte]
Sunday was a game of field position mate. Not much was on all day.[/quote:yj1cidte]
Yes, but surely the kicking game could have been better.. What is the point of watching th winger catch the ball on the full every time.
Jeba
International
- Mar 4, 2008
- 6,501
- 244
It's just the way the game panned out. The game was played mostly between the 20 metre lines so we hardly got in a position for attacking kicks. Putting it high in the air means more time for the chasers to chase and less distance between them and the winger when the ball is caught.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 21,911
- 3,933
It's the same every week.
Jeba
International
- Mar 4, 2008
- 6,501
- 244
Coxy said:
Yup, and this coming from Wallace's biggest bagger as well [icon_wink
Beads - same sort of game in Woolloongong last year when we won 12-2. Based around the kick, and good field position. Our kicking game that night was perfect and not one kick was put in looking for a try. They were put in to have the Dragons working it out from their own line and kicking from deep in their territory. The brains trust at the Broncos coaching staff have obviously devised a tactic for games against the Dragons and considering we have won 3 of our last 4 clashes with them, seems to work well.
- Mar 5, 2008
- 21,911
- 3,933
Seems a bit wastefull when we have Folau and Yow Yeh who can both take the kick well.
- Status
