uptheguts
QCup Player
- Oct 24, 2013
- 378
- 149
Well done Mal on asking the referee boss, Tony Archer, what the hell we are going to get this year. Will it be game two or game three last year? I hope Mal received an assurance that it will be normal NRL standard . Surly the general public deserve the same assurance.
One thing that worries me is the reversal of refereeing policy on high shots in recent weeks. The way I read it if a player stays down after a high tackle , it is up to the video ref to adjudicate if it is a reportable offence and if it is then and only then it will warrant a penalty.
As we know NSW always come out with plenty of high stuff . So it will be up to the video refs to deem if NSW get penalized. It all adds up to even more high shots then ever..
I suppose we can also expect NSW to put in their usual amount of grub work on the tackled player ie facial massages etc. It's funny how the NSW based refs ignore that stuff in the clinch games (eg Game 2 last year ) and start to ref properly when the series is won.
As usual we can expect Rabs and Gould to turn a blind eye to every NSW grub act.
One thing that worries me is the reversal of refereeing policy on high shots in recent weeks. The way I read it if a player stays down after a high tackle , it is up to the video ref to adjudicate if it is a reportable offence and if it is then and only then it will warrant a penalty.
As we know NSW always come out with plenty of high stuff . So it will be up to the video refs to deem if NSW get penalized. It all adds up to even more high shots then ever..
I suppose we can also expect NSW to put in their usual amount of grub work on the tackled player ie facial massages etc. It's funny how the NSW based refs ignore that stuff in the clinch games (eg Game 2 last year ) and start to ref properly when the series is won.
As usual we can expect Rabs and Gould to turn a blind eye to every NSW grub act.