- Jan 25, 2013
- 25,617
- 29,896
Not quite sure what you're point is......you've just admitted that it's "do-able, hard, but do-able", of which I agree. Your father's, much like my own fathers 45-55K, 30 years ago, would be the equivalent now (IMO) to about 80K.
My point is that 100K/yr isn't as much as you think for a family to flourish on......and those that think it is, aren't trying to raise a teenage family.
Different story if you're content to live alone, in a 2 br apartment.....plonking away at your keyboard. Others aspire to bigger things.....
Everyone is forgetting that he has earned shitloads in the past. At some point in time he should have realised that the money wouldn't last forever. He should have set himself up that he'd be mortgage-free and have investments in place that could give him a residual income for the remainder of his non-playing life. Even if it's not enough to live on it'd be enough to supplement a normal wage to make him more comfortable.