POST GAME [Round 1, 2022] Broncos vs Rabbitohs

[BooKhaki]

Because KW knows more than you do. Don't worry, I'm sure all you great judges will be vindicated by the end of the year.

This is such a piss poor argument.

 

[Huge]

No one argues he’s solid but @Huge carries on like he’s an immortal in waiting. Kennedy is good depth and there is nothing wrong with that.

Wrong, never said he's brilliant so why the lies? Such a wanker you are. I've always defended him against unfair criticism but please explain why his coach picked him when he had options.

 

[BroncosFever]

This is such a piss poor argument.

You new around here?

There's never a good argument when it to come our favourite pensioner, it's stats.. other players making errors.. him being the "lowest paid player" (which cannot be proven unless you know him personally).. KW choosing him over others (the key thing there being that others were unavailable to be picked, same with Isaako).

 

[Sproj]

Wrong, never said he's brilliant so why the lies? Such a wanker you are. I've always defended him against unfair criticism but please explain why his coach picked him when he had options.

Hey look at that, typical pointless post from @Huge. Anyone see this type of pointless response coming?

But don’t worry if you didn’t see it coming, another will follow.

 

[Huge]

Mate I have gone back and watched the replay as well and @Huge is right on the second one. Kennedy did not give away a six again for not clearing the ruck at the 38th minute. In the play leading up to that he made unintentional contact with the ball giving rise to Souths getting a tackle count restart.

He was responsible for placing us under pressure at the 37th minute by giving away possession with a penalty for playing the ball incorrectly on our 30 metre line. But that was a lazy mistake that a number of others made. I rated his game as solid.

Reading your post is like wandering in the desert for days and finally stumbling in to an oasis.
Exactly correct, he was solid and that's what you need from your bench. He's a capable, cheap and reliable forward who seldom gives away penalties, perfect for a bench forward.

 

[BroncosFever]

Reading your post is like wandering in the desert for days and finally stumbling in to an oasis.
Exactly correct, he was solid and that's what you need from your bench. He's a capable, cheap and reliable forward who seldom gives away penalties, perfect for a bench forward.

Give yourself an uppercut.

 

[McHunt]

Cobbs screwed up a number of times and that was disappointing but he kept turning up. I love that he doesn’t drop his head and defensively, he’s strong. Stopping Mansour in his tracks a number of times is no mean feat.

Yep, my optimism that post covid fatigue knobbled his trial might have been on the mark. Not too worried by his bumbling right now as long as he gradually improves over the next couple of months. He bumbled the QCup grand final as well, so we might need to extend our patience beyond what we had with Xavier.

 

[Sproj]

Yep, my optimism that post covid fatigue knobbled his trial might have been on the mark. Not too worried by his bumbling right now as long as he gradually improves over the next couple of months. He bumbled the QCup grand final as well, so we might need to extend our patience beyond what we had with Xavier.

I think they are totally different players. Coates had the exciting leap but made errors fairly regularly jumping for the ball and just would not stay on his wing. He also had no venue in his kick returns. Cobbs already covers him defensively and with energy.

 

[McHunt]

I think they are totally different players. Coates had the exciting leap but made errors fairly regularly jumping for the ball and just would not stay on his wing. He also had no venue in his kick returns. Cobbs already covers him defensively and with energy.

Their only try was down his side. I think you've forgotten how exciting Xavier was early on. He made fewer errors than Selwyn, jumped higher than anyone we've ever seen, and was up there with the fastest. He played a lot of games for us before we started to notice a pattern in his defence and a weakness retaining the ball in the air. He, like Selwyn, probably needed more time in the lower grade, but he showed too much promise to ignore his talent. I expect we'll have to be even more patient with Ezra if we want to groom him at 6 this season, which appears to be Kevvie's plan.

 

[Huge]

This is such a piss poor argument.

Try explaining why KW picks him but you wouldn't. Better that than attacking my observation. Go on, explain it.

 

[Sproj]

Their only try was down his side. I think you've forgotten how exciting Xavier was early on. He made fewer errors than Selwyn, jumped higher than anyone we've ever seen, and was up there with the fastest. He played a lot of games for us before we started to notice a pattern in his defence and a weakness retaining the ball in the air. He, like Selwyn, probably needed more time in the lower grade, but he showed too much promise to ignore his talent. I expect we'll have to be even more patient with Ezra if we want to groom him at 6 this season, which appears to be Kevvie's plan.

Fair points for sure. I reckon Coates will become a genuine weapon at the Storm but I also think Selwyn has a better work ethic. Both exciting young players but the thing I like, the club is producing some promising backs again. Now we just to start getting some spine talent coming through and Mam and Mozer are hopeful signs that’s happening.

 

[Accept]

to be truthful, the most educated broncos fans really do live here though. You think it’s a struggle in here? Jesus, it’s very bare out there.

I've been saying that for years. FB is polluted with adult fans that share the same logic as children except that most children have better grammar. RL forums (fb) contain the stupidest people on earth. I wouldn't even bother with social media (RL wise) if not for BHQ.

 

[BooKhaki]

Try explaining why KW picks him but you wouldn't. Better that than attacking my observation. Go on, explain it.

You do know with this line of argument, you are saying that KW could never be wrong?

Because there is nobody else, and KW over-rates him. There is a reason no other club wants him, even Redcliffe haven't looked at signing him and they need squad fillers.

He's a dud.

 

[lynx000]

Hey look at that, typical pointless post from @Huge. Anyone see this type of pointless response coming?

But don’t worry if you didn’t see it coming, another will follow.

Mate, far be it from me to defend the large one (he is more than capable of doing that himself), a lot of posters pile on in this place without giving thought to what he is saying and just write it off as the old man yelling at clouds.

His fundamental issue is that posters have their scapegoats and tend to pile on unfairly and not consider the player's complete game. His point about Kennedy in this thread has been fundamentally correct if you actually go back and watch the game.

People on here do scapegoat and do pile on in their criticisms and then the player can do no right and no one actually acknowledges their other contributions in the course of the game. The criticism is not balanced it is usually laced with hyperbole (and @Huge does this in his responses as well which just inflames the issue), that is what his issue is. No one is saying that players are beyond criticism, just that it should be balanced.

Haas, three minutes to go, Souths desperate to score, gives away a penalty for knocking the ball out. Not a peep of criticism.

 

[Sproj]

Mate, far be it from me to defend the large one (he is more than capable of doing that himself), a lot of posters pile on in this place without giving thought to what he is saying and just write it off as the old man yelling at clouds.

His fundamental issue is that posters have their scapegoats and tend to pile on unfairly and not consider the player's complete game. His point about Kennedy in this thread has been fundamentally correct if you actually go back and watch the game.

People on here do scapegoat and do pile on in their criticisms and then the player can do no right and no one actually acknowledges their other contributions in the course of the game. The criticism is not balanced it is usually laced with hyperbole (and @Huge does this in his responses as well which just inflames the issue), that is what his issue is. No one is saying that players are beyond criticism, just that it should be balanced.

Haas, three minutes to go, Souths desperate to score, gives away a penalty for knocking the ball out. Not a peep of criticism.

Oh I understand his argument and at times agree with him. What I don’t like is the tone in his posts and how he just drones on about the same points on and on and on. He has a point at times but it just details the thread and is unnecessarily aggressive.

I’m always of the opinion that if you start using names, talk down to others and get aggressive in your posts, you aren’t worth taking the time to respond to regardless of validity of point.

@Huge makes a lot of good points but when he carries on with a petty bug bear, he isn’t worth the attempts at civil discussion because in these instances, he isn’t capable of it.

 

[McHunt]

I've been saying that for years. FB is polluted with adult fans that share the same logic as children except that most children have better grammar. RL forums (fb) contain the stupidest people on earth. I wouldn't even bother with social media (RL wise) if not for BHQ.

Your definately wrong about this.

 

[lynx000]

Oh I understand his argument and at times agree with him. What I don’t like is the tone in his posts and how he just drones on about the same points on and on and on. He has a point at times but it just details the thread and is unnecessarily aggressive.

I’m always of the opinion that if you start using names, talk down to others and get aggressive in your posts, you aren’t worth taking the time to respond to regardless of validity of point.

@Huge makes a lot of good points but when he carries on with a petty bug bear, he isn’t worth the attempts at civil discussion because in these instances, he isn’t capable of it.

Fair points mate, I also understand where you are coming from.

 

[Huge]

Oh I understand his argument and at times agree with him. What I don’t like is the tone in his posts and how he just drones on about the same points on and on and on. He has a point at times but it just details the thread and is unnecessarily aggressive.

I’m always of the opinion that if you start using names, talk down to others and get aggressive in your posts, you aren’t worth taking the time to respond to regardless of validity of point.

@Huge makes a lot of good points but when he carries on with a petty bug bear, he isn’t worth the attempts at civil discussion because in these instances, he isn’t capable of it.

I notice you find fault with me but why don't you acknowledge that you and others have faults and won't admit to mistakes? Like claiming RK fucked up twice? Why no admission that the goal line 6 again was no one's fault and just rugby league being the game it is?

Finally, the overwhelming bulk of my posts are 100% civil, I just don't accept outright lies and undeserved condemnation of guys playing their hearts out, getting back up and making one more effort for my beloved club. These guys deserve our respect but no, that doesn't mean immunity from criticism.