Mr Fourex
International Rep
Contributor
- Apr 9, 2012
- 12,591
- 14,299
Wallace to the backrow....:scared:
.......replacing McC
.......replacing McC
How could someone being dropped be at someone elses expense? :laugh:
Whitchurch came in at Denan's expense.
Well Maranta could've been picked ahead of Kemp on the other wing with Reed back, but both were dropped for Whitchurch.
Looks like Hoffman is now preferred over Kahu as a centre if someone is out.
I would have kept Wallace in the halves, that is his position and he is a gifted halfback. Agree Hunt should be the hooker.It's interesting how they didn't put Hunt at hooker and Wallace would stay in the halves. That's what they've mostly been playing. I wonder why?
I would have kept Wallace in the halves, that is his position and he is a gifted halfback. Agree Hunt should be the hooker.
finally!!!!!!! Wallace to hooker! As a halfback hes boring and uninteresting, as a hooker, he could be a star. So psyched.
It is a risky move from Hook but it has also been made to tighten our defence which is so like his coaching style. Apparently it is for the Origin period only which I find crazy. I can't find any reason good enough to be moving your hooker to the backrow and your halfback to hooker for a few games. It will be interesting to see if it is a masterstroke or not.
Maybe the players have taken on their typical Origin period mindset of "no one expects us to win, we'll put in a passable effort" because we're the "Baby Broncos" - which was a stupid excuse years ago but shouldn't hold water here when our 1, 6, 7 and 9 aren't playing Origin.
I would have kept Wallace in the halves, that is his position and he is a gifted halfback. Agree Hunt should be the hooker.