HarryAllan7
QCup Player
- Jul 20, 2017
- 931
- 4,171
Ah yes, that's what we are sorely missing.... the sneaky 70th minute outside back interchange that worked so well for us in 2020.
Ah yes, that's what we are sorely missing.... the sneaky 70th minute outside back interchange that worked so well for us in 2020.
Bennett uses it frequently
Bellamy has used it in the past (especially with Paps/Hynes)
and we certainly could have used a back on the bench in the last game we played since we lost 2 outside backs to concussion
Really shows the importance of having an 80 minute hooker nowadays.
there are very few 80 minute hookers left in the game (especially with the 6 again rule) ... Melbourne don't even have one
Maybe the idea is to use Oates as a utility and Arthars as a backup for Oates. I would still rather have Bullemor.Both these coaches use an outside back on the bench as a utility, they don't carry a second hooker in the 14 like we are here. (I don't count Brandon Smith because he is more forward than hooker)
Outside back on the bench for insurance is nothing new, but devoting 2 spots of your 4 man bench to players who may not be needed at all doesn't seem particularly bright.
Oates is the perfect bench player who could cover both outside backs if needed and put some minutes in the forwards.
Really shows the importance of having an 80 minute hooker nowadays.
I'd classify Grant an 80 min hooker when he is healthy.
Hodgson too.................
Um ,why wouldn't arthars be back up for Staggs who would almost definitely not play the full 80.Maybe the idea is to use Oates as a utility and Arthars as a backup for Oates. I would still rather have Bullemor.
We were getting 50 points put on us without heavy legs. What does this mean for the next month?I see this as a positive. One high-intensity session and a couple of them go down? That shows how poor our conditioning is. This is the time of year Bennett used to put the team through a second pre-season (technically, just after Origin but we're only supplying 1 or 2 players this year). The team will have heavy legs for the next month but should be physically peaking for our run home to the premiership. I mean, spoon avoidance.
Last time I looked at Kevvie's notes he had Staggs down for 80, but double underlined. Not sure what that means, but I reckon you might be onto something. Contingencies R US.Um ,why wouldn't arthars be back up for Staggs who would almost definitely not play the full 80.
I wouldn't class either Grant or Smith as 80 minute hookers, although Grant can play that if necessary. he is just far far less effective if he does.
but for argument's sake let's say you count Grant and Hodgson as 80 minute hookers, along with Macca and Cook. that 4 out of 16 teams that have them
Not quite.I wouldn't class either Grant or Smith as 80 minute hookers, although Grant can play that if necessary. he is just far far less effective if he does.
but for argument's sake let's say you count Grant and Hodgson as 80 minute hookers, along with Macca and Cook. that 4 out of 16 teams that have them
Mahoney regularly plays 80 minutes, so does Brailey at the Knights, Brailey at the Sharks also. Liddle has done it multiple times and Koroisau often played 80 before being injured.I wouldn't class either Grant or Smith as 80 minute hookers, although Grant can play that if necessary. he is just far far less effective if he does.
but for argument's sake let's say you count Grant and Hodgson as 80 minute hookers, along with Macca and Cook. that 4 out of 16 teams that have the
This. It also gives them the option of Staggs to 6, Croft bench to see how he goes.Um ,why wouldn't arthars be back up for Staggs who would almost definitely not play the full 80.
Sixty! We're comin for you tigers!We were getting 50 points put on us without heavy legs. What does this mean for the next month?