Bish
QCup Player
- May 11, 2023
- 635
- 1,826
To be fair, though, where's he supposed to go?
View attachment 23222
Oh, yeah, right, straight ahead into all that empty space in front of him.
To be fair, though, where's he supposed to go?
View attachment 23222
Oh, yeah, right, straight ahead into all that empty space in front of him.
I don't get why the NRL are so afraid to utilise very simple technology. It's kinda weird considering how open they are to changing the fundamental rules of the game.
spot on, got himself into a bad position and froze up. He could have done almost anything to improve on what he did. He took his eyes off the players coming through in support. It's like he was wondering if he left the iron on at home.
There's even games like Thursday where both fans feel it was rigged against them! How deep does it go?Devils advocate here but that would actually be the case if the match fixing/game management was in-depth enough
They’ve got to make it feel evenly rigged to through you off the trail. It’s gaslightingThere's even games like Thursday where both fans feel it was rigged against them! How deep does it go?
Every time I see the BS Staggs offside decision, I get more and more confused.
"Supporting the live decision" is only meant to be for when the camera angles don't clearly show the play. here that is not the case. The vision clearly shows the entire play.
I'm going to watch Annseley on Monday, because WHEN he justifies the officials failing to follow proper procedure, it will be a masterclass in spin that may come in handy one day
Besides getting in the way of a try, I don't think Atkins did that bad a job. I also don't ont think many on field refs do a bad job. They're human, and like the players will make mistakes now and then (especially when you have pointless linesmen, and have such a fast game with so much to keep an eye on).Positioning is a very important part of the Referee's job and he made a huge blunder there, combined with how many Captains calls that where right, Atkins had a terrible day at the office.
He is very lucky it didn't change who won the game.
That line is misleading. on the left it's pretty much half way between the 10 and 20 (so 15 metres out). On the right it's probably 17 metres out. If anything the line should be at least 1 metre ahead of where it is in front of Staggs. It's not even line ball, Staggs was way on-side. "Supporting the on- field decision", when the refs and touchies don't have the replays and freeze-frame of the bunker, is unfathomable. There is no possible justification for that call.
That line is misleading. on the left it's pretty much half way between the 10 and 20 (so 15 metres out). On the right it's probably 17 metres out. If anything the line should be at least 1 metre ahead of where it is in front of Staggs. It's not even line ball, Staggs was way on-side. "Supporting the on- field decision", when the refs and touchies don't have the replays and freeze-frame of the bunker, is unfathomable. There is no possible justification for that call.
As is increasingly common, the whole game was a circus.Every time I see the BS Staggs offside decision, I get more and more confused.
"Supporting the live decision" is only meant to be for when the camera angles don't clearly show the play. here that is not the case. The vision clearly shows the entire play.
I'm going to watch Annseley on Monday, because WHEN he justifies the officials failing to follow proper procedure, it will be a masterclass in spin that may come in handy one day
Atkins had a stinker bro.Besides getting in the way of a try, I don't think Atkins did that bad a job. I also don't ont think many on field refs do a bad job. They're human, and like the players will make mistakes now and then (especially when you have pointless linesmen, and have such a fast game with so much to keep an eye on).
The problem I have, is with the bunker, who seem to be the ones making all the calls about sin bins, foul play, etc. Also, with all the angles and technology they have, still get it soooo wrong (e.g. staggs disallowed try).
One of those challenges was to get a clear dangerous hit on Walsh examined that had been ignored and could have resulted in us losing the ball. That second half was a farce both from the refereeing on the field and the bunker.Atkins had a stinker bro.
I think there was a total of 7 successful captains challenges between the two teams.
That's on top of the bad calls that didn't get challenged and the howlers on Staggs/Smoothy and Haas.
He had a terrible night.
I'm sure if every decision in an NRL match was challenged there would be quite a few that are successful. Sometimes I think all the extra camera angles has ruined the game for the fans at home.Atkins had a stinker bro.
I think there was a total of 7 successful captains challenges between the two teams.
That's on top of the bad calls that didn't get challenged and the howlers on Staggs/Smoothy and Haas.
He had a terrible night.
I would be crucified at work if external stakeholders pointed out me making 3 massive mistakes in 40 minutes of work.