- Apr 9, 2012
- 12,617
- 14,356
It’s not an agenda it’s an opinion based on him letting the ball bounce twice and fucking up another bomb. He also ran for 56m which is not good enough for a full back
I'm with you.......Milf was always going to be a risk at fullback defensively. He doesn't like the high ball....he's not even calling out "yours", instead, he just stands there, frozen.
He's running less now than when he was at no.6. which was supposed to be the attraction.
IMO the experiment is over and him and Boyd should be switched back. Neither are offering what we need in their respective positions in the current set up.
Last edited: