Fair call. I can see how my last post could come across as personal, but that was certainly not my intention. I guess in attempting to reinforce my point, I tried to use your own reasoning in examples against what you were saying. So, my apologies if I’ve come across personal.
And you’ll just have to take me at face value when I say that I DO NOT have an agenda against Gillett.
Indeed, I personally believe that currently, Gillett would be the first Bronco picked for rep teams (although I think McGuire is more consistent and Boyd circa '15, '16 was easily our premier player with respect to rep teams). With this though, comes the highest expectations. I guess what I am saying is, similarly to your heightened expectations of Boyd (which I agree with), Gillett simply must be held to the same lofty standards.
With that said, it certainly appears to me that you are scoring him, whether consciously or subconsciously, higher than the sum of his performance at the moment.
That or you’re scoring others too low.
If you read my original post, that's all I was trying to say.
Whilst I’m happy to be proven wrong, I just don’t agree that Gillett was the close to, or better, than Lodge, McGuire or Sims last night. Credit where its due, those guys played well. If Gillett gets a 7, those blokes all deserve at least 8's. They were that much better in their roles than Gillett was in his.
Which arcs back to my earlier point about people allowing their bias to cloud their judgement. That’s not a personal attack, but it also doesn’t make it any less true.
With respect to my Lodge and Lockyer example; you’ve provided reasoning as to why Lodge needs to improve those areas, and whilst I don’t agree it’s valid criticism based simply on the fact he is still so incredibly green in the NRL, they are reasons nonetheless.
What does strike me as strange though, is that you’re willing to hold Lodge accountable for his mistakes so early in his career whilst ignoring his inexperience, but still not criticise Gillett for his shortcomings, even though he is a seasoned veteran and walk-up start in all rep teams. I am not trying to be patronising, but does that make sense? I am, however, sorry if the Lockyer comment seemed a bit strong, it was only intended to be a grossly overstated simile, not a dig.
Moving on, I guess we will have to agree to disagree when it comes to Cordner and Gillett over the last couple of years. Which, as a Broncos fan is so frustrating, because I know Gillett can be every bit as good as him, if not better. Right now though, I just don’t think he’s close. But I do want to be clear, I was comparing Gillett to Cordner when I said he was only participating, not commenting on his place in the team as a whole. I stand by this. If I didn’t explain that well in my previous posts, I am more so trying to accentuate that Cordner continues to get better, Gillett continues to decline. That’s my main concern around Gillett, because we need him to fire if we're to get anywhere near the pointy end of any season in the next few years.
Regarding our halfbacks since 2014, quite simply, I was wrong. I thought both Prince and Wallace played in ‘14, but they both left at the end of ‘13. My mistake.
Benji did play 7 at times though last year, so if I didn’t get my years wrong, that would have made 5 - but obviously, that’s all academic.
I must ask, as we clearly disagree on a few things I am genuinely interested to hear your thoughts; what are you expecting from the someone or anyone else on the 4th or 5th tackle that McGuire isn’t providing? I am not naive enough to think that McGuire simply rucking it up is the best option, but right now it may be our only option. I'd much rather that than have Milf, Kodi or Macca stink it up and get caught with the ball, or give it to a flat-footed bloke who isn't expecting it only to lose ground, or put in some half-arsed afterthought kick, as these seem to be our only go to moves when McGuire isn't there.
Again, sorry if anything previously came across as personal or anything in this post does. I can't stand keyboard warriors turning discussions, that are simply differences of opinion, into personal attacks. So if you think I am doing that, let me know. Cheers.
First of all, thank you for taking the high road.
I am not sure I would've been able to, as I am truly sick and tired of the usual "bias" or "agenda" moniker some people throw around to weigh up and validate their opinion against their target's.
I thought you were doing that too, and threw you on the same heap. My sincere apologies!
I think our opinions collide in regards to Gillett, because of what we see as the source of his attacking decline.
Although this doesn't do him justice and is very simplistically put, Cordner doesn't make things happen, he merely runs good lines into gaps opened by his half's work. I lost count of the times Gillett ran a good line, only for his half to pass too late, too soon, or more often than not, not pass at all.
This started when Hunt captured the half's spot next to Gillo, being notoriously bad using people outside of him on the right side. A second rower's attack prowess falls or stands with his half, and Hunt was simply horrid in that aspect, which largely contributed to Gillo's decline and rustiness.
Maybe that is my bias speaking, but I can't blame Matty for that. He needs a guy next to him, who has a clue about using a gun backrower. In the rep Arena and even last season with Niko, Gillett was definitely a better player in offense thanks to that.
Gillett has been criminally under-utilised on that right edge in my opinion, which is why I often hoped he would move to the left, play off, and protect Milford.
BTW, Benji barely ever played on Gillett's side, so I am not going to count him as one of those halves.
Now, in the last two games, two very visible errors were made involving Kodi and Gillo, one in defense last week, one in attack this week. The fact I don't see Nikorima as a Halfback and my self confessed man-crush on Gillett, leads people to believe I am using the incidents to further an agenda, instead of seeing it for what it clearly is... Kodi opening a gap in defense last week, and making a meal of a relatively easy pass to his right yesterday (which I would add, is not something I would normally expect from him).
I am not going to take points off Gillett because of Kodi's errors, or because he didn't break the game open by himself despite being our top Rep player, or because I know how much more he has to offer. He doesn't get attacking bonus points from me in his scores, but he gets a + for his very good disruptive sapper work (which makes me think people wanting him out of the starting 13 are nuts), hence the 7.
Likewise, I gave points to Lodge for his work carting the ball and his tackling efforts, but also took them off for what I see as a serious flaw in his game at the moment, which is his defensive ruck work.
His experience in the NRL will undoubtedly make a difference, and I am sure he will improve, but again, that has no bearing on his score, which is based only on the game against the Tigers.
Is it harsh? Possibly... but keeping the ruck tight, is one of the most important aspects of the game, especially for a prop. It doesn't mean I don't have faith in Lodge's future (on the paddock).
In regards to McGuire, let me start by saying that my stance is predicated on our 4th and 5th tackles being in the opposition's last 30, not when we are still in our half. Our halves are the ones who must get the ball in their hands at that point!
If they don't, I still prefer a forward capable of more than McGuire in the creative stakes (offload, pass at the line, ability to get a quick PTB, etc...), which is the main reason I don't want him as lock and looking for the ball late in each set, emulating a Gallen (who at least had an offload) in stiffling his attack.
I do get where you're coming from, but even if Kodi, Milf or Boyd make a meal of it most times, there is still a bigger chance of a positive outcome, than Moose just taking another hit-up into the opposition's defensive line, which then simply becomes a lost opportunity.
I would trade positions between him and TPJ in a heart beat, whom I would rotate with Thaiday.
Again, this doesn't make me a Moose hater, because I would immediately have him as our no.1 prop, which is where he belongs despite his smaller size imo.