GCBRONCO
International Captain
- Mar 4, 2008
- 22,220
- 20,538
Feels like we are getting all the injuries we should have got last season compressed into the opening 5 rounds of the season
Current status of the GF team to date... 8 of the 17 either injured or playing elsewhereFeels like we are getting all the injuries we should have got last season compressed into the opening 5 rounds of the season
Doesn't have to be a finger on him for it to be a surrender tackle.As for the Munster “no try”?! That was a try . Not a finger on Mariner, fair game.
The contention is that Munster didn't contact the player, he only contacted the ball. Klein had not called surrender like he was supposed to do when it was clear that Mariner was motionless on the ground.If a player with the ball is on the ground and the ball or ball carrying arm has touched the ground and they aren’t trying to get up, the moment you place a hand on them it’s tackle complete.
Munster can’t steal the ball from him without doing it after the tackle is complete.
How funny is it hearing the commentators say "so uncharacteristic for the aerial specialist" when he drops his REGULAR 2 or 3 catches a game.Seriously…. Turncoats breaks the blokes back and gets a medal. **** off.
I just don't recall him extending the knee so violently to 'own the air space'.That really sucks about Mariner but the Coates try was pretty great tbh, loved when we had Folau doing exactly that to opponents every week.
That’s just the point @Big Pete.Doesn't have to be a finger on him for it to be a surrender tackle.
Can you recall that ever being play on?
It’s very deliberateI just don't recall him extending the knee so violently to 'own the air space'.
He got taken out in the air illegally and landed heavilyThat’s just the point @Big Pete.
He fell to the ground. Held the ball up for Munster to take. Nothing wrong with it.
If in fact we’re saying it was a tackle, then it’s a voluntary tackle, not a surrender and for that shit every player should be sent.
After all that, and to be clear, I’m not arguing against the decision (it went in the Broncos favour) just saying what I think if roles were reversed.
Most importantly **** Munster, double **** the Storm!!!
Defending wingers will need to be just as violent back towards him then... can't just let him have free reign to make those catches every time it goes up.I just don't recall him extending the knee so violently to 'own the air space'.
That’s just the point @Big Pete.
He fell to the ground. Held the ball up for Munster to take. Nothing wrong with it.
If in fact we’re saying it was a tackle, then it’s a voluntary tackle, not a surrender and for that shit every player should be sent.
After all that, and to be clear, I’m not arguing against the decision (it went in the Broncos favour) just saying what I think if roles were reversed.
Most importantly **** Munster, double **** the Storm!!!
This. I thought so too.He got taken out in the air illegally and landed heavily
They've changed the rules and voluntary tackles are fine. The contention is that Klein didn't call surrender when he should have. Instead he ruled tackle was complete as soon as Munster attempted to strip the ball.
Can you recall any instance where a player has pilfered the ball and it's been called play on? I can't recall too many instances off the top of my head but tend to get the impression in that situation it never goes the way of the team trying to take advantage.