McHunt
International Rep
Contributor
- Aug 25, 2018
- 17,936
- 31,003
You can't unsee this:
Shame we can't get these guys and gal officiating a bit more then.Gough, Sharpe, Butler and Brough are all from the QRL.
Yeah, I don't get it. It's clearly dangerous, and careless at best. I don't know what he should be charged with, but I'm just glad Billy didn't get his leg snapped in half.To me it looks like he is dropping his body weight on the back of walters legs which was the definition about 2-3 weeks ago. But because cleary does that, it has somehow changed.
Not only does he do that, but traps walters leg to make it even more dangerous.
But yes this is definutely comparable to an accidental hair pull. **** the nrl are useless *****.
Yeah, I don't get it. It's clearly dangerous, and careless at best. I don't know what he should be charged with, but I'm just glad Billy didn't get his leg snapped in half.
Shame we can't get these guys and gal officiating a bit more then.
I think in both scenarios it just might be the coach that is the problem.Your filter: Turpin is "shit" but got made captain and keeps being picked each week. The coach can't see how "shit" he is.
My filter: Turpin plays according to Kevvie's instructions, which brings him favour with the coach. Paix played to the same style, according to the coach's instructions. At the beginning of the season, the coach impressed on the need for defence first, everything else later.
Which filter best describes reality?
Flegler would get 6 weeks for that.
It's clearly a trip, not your textbook one as he we was trying to grapple him to ground at the same time but he has clearly used his leg there to put him off balance and bring him to ground
He's been charged with grade one dangerous contact but it looks more like a grade 2 dangerous throw to me. There's a massive difference in the suspension between these two:Yes a guy who is trying to move forward is in a sideways position, totally Billy's fault.
Really? I'd say watch it again and he did precious little wrong. The offload didn't look good but that aside he tackled well 32/34 and 90 metres. Really cannot see how bad that is supposed to be. What am I missing? Where else did he go wrong? Found his front quicker than just about all the other forwards, made post contact metres, quick ptb's so what else have I missed?I'm not usually a Kennedy basher, but i thought that was one of the worst games i've seen him play for Brisbane. I thought our entire bench was poor if i'm honest. Robati and James offered even less than Kennedy
I guess it depends whether you see Turpin not running as a problem. Looks to me like Kevvie just wants the ball shifted to Reynolds or his son, and to leave the thinking (running) up to them.I think in both scenarios it just might be the coach that is the problem.
I guess it depends whether you see Turpin not running as a problem. Looks to me like Kevvie just wants the ball shifted to Reynolds or his son, and to leave the thinking (running) up to them.
He's been charged with grade one dangerous contact but it looks more like a grade 2 dangerous throw to me. There's a massive difference in the suspension between these two:
Judiciary Code
Listing of NRL judicial code table penalties, including tripping, kicking, striking, high tackle, dangerous throw, shoulder charge, dangerous and contrary conduct.www.nrl.com
Really? I'd say watch it again and he did precious little wrong. The offload didn't look good but that aside he tackled well 32/34 and 90 metres. Really cannot see how bad that is supposed to be. What am I missing? Where else did he go wrong? Found his front quicker than just about all the other forwards, made post contact metres, quick ptb's so what else have I missed?
Didn't see that coming from old Brandy