Would Kevvie even be willing to take Seibold's sloppy seconds? I guess he doesn't have too many other prospects...
I don't think he's the answer, short-term or long-term, but I do have to agree with whoever said we need to get that particular monkey off our backs before we can move forward, so I guess he's not a terrible solution. Surely he can't go worse than Seibold, and if they only give him an incentive-based short-term contract, it's no real loss if he doesn't bring any significant improvement and we need to move him on in a year or two. I still want Hodges involved, though.
Realistically, though, we probably have Seibold until the end of next year, minimum.