- Jan 25, 2014
- 44,186
- 33,341
Wow, take the NRL to court. That is not legal.
Yeah that’s what I thought. And when you consider NSW had Gavin Badger working with them and was in the NSW coaching box during Game 1, it makes this even worse.
Wow, take the NRL to court. That is not legal.
It’s like they think they are the Mafia and above the law.
Threatening family members of the individual if the individual doesn’t comply..?
They’ve screwed the pooch on this one.
He also works with the Tigers, pretty sure he's employed by them. Sits in the coaches box with Maguire.Isn't Gavin Badger part of the Blues coaching team? Could have sworn I saw him in the coaches box with a NSW polo on jumping up after a NSW try like a little schoolgirl.
What I mean is that this makes them extremely vulnerable, with no chance of recourse if challenged.
The rest of their deplorable behaviour has thus far been controlled to be unchallengeable, whereas this one sits out like a zit on the tip of your nose.
Semantics. I didn’t like my phrasing either but I’m dying of man-flu, so words hurt.
I mean when PVL looks like the Wish version of a Mafia don and was in charge of the racing industry, it’s not surprising behaviourIt’s like they think they are the Mafia and above the law.
Threatening family members of the individual if the individual doesn’t comply..?
They’ve screwed the pooch on this one.
I won’t be. I’ve not been around anyone apart from germ infested kids.
Wow, take the NRL to court. That is not legal.
I’m gonna disagree on that one. They are falsely accusing them of collusion.
No they're not. They're pointing out a conflict of interest that can't be allowed. It's risk mitigation, not accusations. Conflict of interest is one of the first things trained in business, and in the biggest boldest letters at the top of the page it says "AVOID HOLY SHIT AVOID"
Had my test this morning. I guess I caught it here. Ffs.Yeah I’m off to get tested shortly myself.
You might have an argument here until you look at past behaviours - referees working with clubs pre season, ex players in bunkers deciding on games their old clubs are involved in, etc.No they're not. They're pointing out a conflict of interest that can't be allowed. It's risk mitigation, not accusations. Conflict of interest is one of the first things trained in business, and in the biggest boldest letters at the top of the page it says "AVOID HOLY SHIT AVOID"
Had my test this morning. I guess I caught it here. Ffs.
You might have an argument here until you look at past behaviours - referees working with clubs pre season, ex players in bunkers deciding on games their old clubs are involved in, etc.
3-0 to nsw gets the nsw public more excited about rugby league?what difference does it make if the brother is in there or not? the nrl are gonna do everything they can to swing it in QLD's way so they can get their decider and raise more revenue
Just wondering is that applied to your most recent employment ;)