LittleDavey
NRL Captain
- Mar 25, 2013
- 3,961
- 7,863
Ha ha ha...you are taking the piss, surely ! Quoting WH &S while sanctioning 4-6 hours of drinking ! Ha ha ..do you not read what you wrote ? So, if they are injured, while pissed up its okay but straight after Walters says, off to bed , nekminnit.... In my opinion he overstepped his authority, sure he may have felt comfortable suggesting they call it a night but issuing an edict to guys after 4-6 hours of drinking is optimistic at best.
Nope, I'm serious. He made the call to be out drinking for 4-6 hours, he's entitled to do that, same as he's entitled to tell them that enough is enough after that. He's the man in control, he can do whatever he likes. If they players don't like it, they can sit out and someone who will abide by the rules that are set will come in - hence the ban. I'm a fan of the harsh penalties.
I get where you're coming from. But I'm also a manager in my day job and I have ultimate responsibility for my guys. I don't mind if they let off a bit of steam in an environment where they're able to (preferably supervised such as the 4-6hrs). But when I say enough is enough, heads will fucking roll if they don't pull them in because I'm responsible (and will be held responsible) even if they're not doing the right thing. I protect myself by enforcing the rules, and for my own liability if the guys play up they will be replaced by those who won't. Does it make me a ****? Probably. I don't care, because I'm not going to end up in jail because my guys didn't do what I asked.
IMO Kevvie is in the same sort of situation. The 4 - 6 hours was controlled with QRL staff around (I'm assuming this would have been the case) to tap guys on the shoulder if they started to play up. There's no such control when guys head out on their own - hence Holmes getting himself into strife. That wouldn't have happened during the 4 - 6 hours because someone else would have pulled him into line earlier.