Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
QUEENSLANDER said:im intrigued as to where the $700k over the cap went?! who are their big stars? smith, slater, inglis and cronk. matty johns just cleared up on his show that cronk was on a very low wage. all the other players are just mid level players, maybe blair and lima on a bit more, but their team this year isnt any better than any other team. i guess they just mustve had to pay smith and the likes more to keep them in melbourne.
and to all those that just go "the players knew, they signed 2 contracts".. how **** stupid are u lol. can u imagine the paperwork they would have to sign? there would be contracts, insurance, 3rd party deals, non-disclosure statements, the list goes on. There is nothing to suggest they knew, until actually proven that way
Anonymous person said:f#$% some of you guys are dense.
lets have a look at some salary cap infringements by a certain team we all love, then decide if the punishment Melbourne received is fair or not.
1. Broncos, 2001, $118,314 over the cap. Included an undisclosed payment of $50,000.
2. Broncos, 2002, $115,067 over the cap. Fully disclosed.
3. Broncos, 2003, Undisclosed guarantee to player via 3rd Party Entity
4. Broncos, 2006, Unapproved TPA
5. Broncos, 2007, Unapproved TPA
6. Broncos, 2009, Playing an Unregistered Player. No contract or Registration. Rnd 1 and Rnd 6
all up ~$200 000 in fines were handed out to the Broncos for salary cap breaches. since 2000 there have only been 4 years where the broncos did NOT breach the salary cap!
now correct me if im wrong, but didnt something pretty significant happen with the Broncos in 2006? hmmm what was it......oh thats right, we won the premiership! so if we are all to agree with stripping melbourne of their premierships then surely we would all agree that the broncos should be stripped of their 2006 title, correct?
also, melbourne knocked up out in 2007 with their salary cap breaching team......but we were also breaching the salary cap. we'll call that one even. 2009, same thing - salary cap breaching melbourne knock the salary cap breaching broncos out. we'll call that one even too hey?
if that doesnt show you that the Storm have been treated unfairly, youre biased - plain and simple.
Je$ter said:What beads said.
If every club who breached the cap got docked all their points it would be a 10 team comp.
Most years at least 2 or 3 clubs have minor breaches.
Beachy said:Wonder if this helped with Cameron Smith electing to resign when the Titans were courting him before last season began ...........
Anonymous person said:f#$% some of you guys are dense.
lets have a look at some salary cap infringements by a certain team we all love, then decide if the punishment Melbourne received is fair or not.
1. Broncos, 2001, $118,314 over the cap. Included an undisclosed payment of $50,000.
2. Broncos, 2002, $115,067 over the cap. Fully disclosed.
3. Broncos, 2003, Undisclosed guarantee to player via 3rd Party Entity
4. Broncos, 2006, Unapproved TPA
5. Broncos, 2007, Unapproved TPA
6. Broncos, 2009, Playing an Unregistered Player. No contract or Registration. Rnd 1 and Rnd 6
all up ~$200 000 in fines were handed out to the Broncos for salary cap breaches. since 2000 there have only been 4 years where the broncos did NOT breach the salary cap!
He is a Melbourne Storm fan so the rose colored glasses are to be expected.Beachy said:Anonymous person said:f#$% some of you guys are dense.
lets have a look at some salary cap infringements by a certain team we all love, then decide if the punishment Melbourne received is fair or not.
1. Broncos, 2001, $118,314 over the cap. Included an undisclosed payment of $50,000.
2. Broncos, 2002, $115,067 over the cap. Fully disclosed.
3. Broncos, 2003, Undisclosed guarantee to player via 3rd Party Entity
4. Broncos, 2006, Unapproved TPA
5. Broncos, 2007, Unapproved TPA
6. Broncos, 2009, Playing an Unregistered Player. No contract or Registration. Rnd 1 and Rnd 6
all up ~$200 000 in fines were handed out to the Broncos for salary cap breaches. since 2000 there have only been 4 years where the broncos did NOT breach the salary cap!
Chalk and cheese.
Beachy said:Wonder if this helped with Cameron Smith electing to resign when the Titans were courting him before last season began ...........
Bucking Beads said:[quote="Anonymous person":20qkf2wb]f#$% some of you guys are dense.
lets have a look at some salary cap infringements by a certain team we all love, then decide if the punishment Melbourne received is fair or not.
1. Broncos, 2001, $118,314 over the cap. Included an undisclosed payment of $50,000.
2. Broncos, 2002, $115,067 over the cap. Fully disclosed.
3. Broncos, 2003, Undisclosed guarantee to player via 3rd Party Entity
4. Broncos, 2006, Unapproved TPA
5. Broncos, 2007, Unapproved TPA
6. Broncos, 2009, Playing an Unregistered Player. No contract or Registration. Rnd 1 and Rnd 6
all up ~$200 000 in fines were handed out to the Broncos for salary cap breaches. since 2000 there have only been 4 years where the broncos did NOT breach the salary cap!
now correct me if im wrong, but didnt something pretty significant happen with the Broncos in 2006? hmmm what was it......oh thats right, we won the premiership! so if we are all to agree with stripping melbourne of their premierships then surely we would all agree that the broncos should be stripped of their 2006 title, correct?
also, melbourne knocked up out in 2007 with their salary cap breaching team......but we were also breaching the salary cap. we'll call that one even. 2009, same thing - salary cap breaching melbourne knock the salary cap breaching broncos out. we'll call that one even too hey?
if that doesnt show you that the Storm have been treated unfairly, youre biased - plain and simple.
Ari Gold said:Beachy said:Wonder if this helped with Cameron Smith electing to resign when the Titans were courting him before last season began ...........
Given it's the Titans in question, probably not [icon_razz1
ningnangnong said:AP mate, you've lost it.
I'd lose it too if my team had just embarrassed the game and themselves by cheating.
$1.1 million of that is from 2009 and 2010 alone. going by that, and the fact that players wouldve had contract upgrades AFTER they won in 2007 and not before, its pretty clear to see that in 2006 when they won the minor premiership and 2007 when they won the premiership they were probably only the same amount over the salary cap as many other teams have been.Bucking Beads said:You are pathetic, how can you even begin to compare the minor Salary Cap breaches the Broncos have made to your beloved Storms $1.7 million dollar rort. Look the punishment sucks for the players but the rules were made and it is cheating not to mention Fraud. You really can't be serious $1.7 Million of rorting is way beyond anything any club has been caught of doing.