Fair point but that doesn't really answer the question.
What does Bennett have to achieve in order to be considered a success?
But if we don't win it then who is going to cop the blame from you? The accolades have never just gone to the coach. He doesn't get to take the trophy home, along with 17 premiership rings. He doesn't win the Clive Churchill medal and get selected in the Australian team afterwards. He is always the last person on the team list. A fair share of the blame will go on Bennett if we don't win a premiership. The key word is fair though. You can't just chastise him on his inability to win a premiership for us yet.
Expand on that a little.
Do you mean ladder position, roster, culture, game-plan, all of the above?
Expand on that a little.
Do you mean ladder position, roster, culture, game-plan, all of the above?
I'll ask others this question.
Does Bennett have to deliver Broncos a premiership in the next three years to be considered anything less than a failure.
He needs to leave the club in a better position than we were. I'd love three premierships though.
The other thing I hear is that WB came back to restore the Broncos aura.
Short answer... yes, absolutely!I'll ask others this question.
Does Bennett have to deliver Broncos a premiership in the next three years to be considered anything less than a failure.
Fair point but that doesn't really answer the question.
What does Bennett have to achieve in order to be considered a success?
Fair enough, it's true you don't have to be respectful but you CAN refer to them in a normal manner without being disparaging. It just seems petulant to me that a wise and grown man has to be mean spirited in virtually every post. Imagine were I to say something nice about WB or Boyd every single time I mentioned him, it would soon be seen as tedious repetition .
Just on the contract saga I do not know the sequence of events but I do know that long before WB was mentioned, long before his break with Tinkler and at the start of the season Hook was on the nose and skating on very thin ice. I believe the club was looking at their options very early on. As far as I am aware there has been nothing concrete presented that WB acted improperly . You are entitled to believe whatever anecdotes you like but it certainly seems to contradict the widely held view that he acted in good faith.
I would think that the same consideration you have for Boyd, now that he is here would be extended to WB, now that he is here.
I read Roy Masters account. So on the Sunday WB phones Murdoch telling him he will take the job, obviously it was offered to him previously. Likely he told Murdoch he would not take the job while Griffin was there..he accepted the job for 2015 and not for the remainder of 2014. It seems that Murdoch made the decision to remove Griffin prior to WB phoning him to say he would take on the role in 2015. We all knew Griffins job was in jeopardy as he did. The view you have presented is the Roy Masters view and even though he is in the media I think it extremely unlikely Murdoch would have shared with Masters what he was intending or the communications he had had previously with WB. The slant you have put on it Porthoz is that WB was sneaking around trying to take the incumbents job when the true powerbroker ,the ultimate authority Murdoch had set out to get his man. If anyone was to be accused of underhanded actions it must be Murdoch although even that may not be true, he could have already told Griffin he was looking for a new direction in 2015.I'm moving this to the Bennett thread, as the other one is about Barba, and we seem to be jumping from one topic to the other...
Regarding the bold bit, I'm sorry, but the widely held view is nothing of the sort.
Obviously only few actually know the whole story in detail, but this is the widely held view:
Wayne Bennett to return in Brisbane Broncos shake-up
My source and others confirm that this is actually pretty close to what happened, including the $950K "disrespectful" bit... except that it wasn't an unanimous board decision, but a decision forced upon the rest of the board by the majority holders.
Take what you want from it...