bronco_babe77
NRL Captain
- Mar 5, 2008
- 3,429
- 0
Hammo said:I voted last, however, if everything said is true; I would still vote 2nd last. I'm no Chicken Little.
FACTS (from what we have been told);
- No sexual assault has occured.
- No unconsenual sex occured.
- No club rules were broken (i.e. no alcohol bans, no curfews)
Therefore, players aren't guilty and would actually have cause to legally prosecute the club if the club attempted disciplinary action!
Very true Hammo. Not getting into the argument of whether the act was disgusting or not, but at this stage, the facts don't show too much do they?
FTR I chose the last one.