Cult
International Rep
Contributor
- Oct 17, 2013
- 12,827
- 14,814
Good career move, why would she waste her time with the drongos on 9.
Um, Phil Gould, Sterlo, Joey and Freddy? Are you ok, dude?
Good career move, why would she waste her time with the drongos on 9.
Never needed women blithering on , don't rate their opinions as I've always thought they were on the panels etc just to appease women. Couldn't care less and really only want to hear from men who've played the game as it's way more likely to be informed. Doesn't mean I automatically respect the opinion.
No need to go into so much detail. Cannot be bothered listening to know nothing women. What can they offer about the game that I cannot get from a former player or coach ?Wow.
Wow.
The only real loss is that 9 have lost a piece of eye candy.
Apart from that, not much else. She agrees with everyone too much. She doesn't offer anything different than what others do on the network.
Are you really shocked though?
Couldn't care less and really only want to hear from men who've played the game as it's way more likely to be informed.
It would be easy to think or deduce that I have no respect for women but that would be an error. The way I see these shows is with the expectation that the opinions and views would be expert in nature. I think it actually demeans women as they are so obviously placed to serve other purposes. Appeal to women, eye candy, drag cash out of women in any and every way. If they bring on females who are experts in related fields, sports medicine, psychology, sleep or administration etc then yes , I'm interested in what they have to say. If it's a nice set of tits and a pretty face offering their great insight to a game they have never played then for me, it's a no.And yet, you would listen to Ray Warren rabbiting on. (pun intended)
So then you also just about never hear a word Yvonne has to say, as she's also on free to air?It would be easy to think or deduce that I have no respect for women but that would be an error. The way I see these shows is with the expectation that the opinions and views would be expert in nature. I think it actually demeans women as they are so obviously placed to serve other purposes. Appeal to women, eye candy, drag cash out of women in any and every way. If they bring on females who are experts in related fields, sports medicine, psychology, sleep or administration etc then yes , I'm interested in what they have to say. If it's a nice set of tits and a pretty face offering their great insight to a game they have never played then for me, it's a no.
Ftr, Ray Warren is on free to air and consequently I just about never hear a word he says. Also, there are the odd one or two I don't particularly like ( Paul Kent ! Certainly ) but at least he played the game. . .
Wherever she plys her trade is of little consequence to me. I don't even know who she is and couldn't pick her out in a lineup unless the others were all men. Her opinion on rugby league has the same value for me as a random woman from the audience. It may in fact be better thought out than many others, male or female but it doesn't change my view that my preference is for expert observation. Everyone knows why women are on these shows and I'm at least honest about it and my dislike for the belief that it's a necessity.So then you also just about never hear a word Yvonne has to say, as she's also on free to air?
Wherever she plys her trade is of little consequence to me. I don't even know who she is and couldn't pick her out in a lineup unless the others were all men. Her opinion on rugby league has the same value for me as a random woman from the audience. It may in fact be better thought out than many others, male or female but it doesn't change my view that my preference is for expert observation. Everyone knows why women are on these shows and I'm at least honest about it and my dislike for the belief that it's a necessity.