tommy
International Rep
- Jun 5, 2015
- 12,898
- 13,713
Look , it's very simple. Melbourne, right out of the horses...... ass, stated they offered Bellamy 3 years from next year. Bennett still has 1 year on his current contract and wants at least another 2. 1 + 2 = 3. If the head office is happy with Bennett, there is no reason they would (seemingly) be desperate to sign Bellamy. And if they are offering him 1.7 or more a year, they are desperate. Personally I can't understand it. I'm not happy with Bennett and believe Bellamy is better coach but from a cost-benefit perspective, I'd rather they stick with Bennett for now. Give him his last year.
But if Bennett is white-anting the club like you suspect he is, wouldn't it be A LOT more beneficial to get rid of him now rather than risk 3 or 4 years of mediocrity because he has gone on a signing spree of no-names and has-beens? Shouldn't we pay an extra 400-500k now rather than risk Bennett succeeding with his plan to throw our club into a half decade of terrible results? Don't you think from a cost-benefit perspective we should be doing anything and everything to run him out of the club? I think you have contradicted yourself here.