abashii
NRL Player
Contributor
- Jul 14, 2014
- 2,874
- 5,910
We haven't had a big signing since izzy Folau.
Anthony Milford?
We haven't had a big signing since izzy Folau.
We haven't had a big signing since izzy Folau.
go through the history of the club ... you can count the number of really big signings on one hand ...
We typically don't go to the market, we rely on our development programs
Anthony Milford?
I actually thought PJ Marsh was a big signing back when they signed him.
Unfortunately, that thought changed when he was a mixed bag for us. Had some good moments, but he wasn't anything special.
It was a shame. I liked Marsh, I always thought he was underrated.
I can't stop laughing at this. Are you fair dinkum?Until he consistently leads the team around and dominates more I can't really say he's a big signing
I can't stop laughing at this. Are you fair dinkum?
Kevin Walters was a handy signing, think he played origin before he came to Broncs. A few others that didn't work out, but were big names at the time nonetheless - Sam Backo (aus and qld rep),Tony Currie (Aus and qld), Peter Jackson (Aus and qld), Dale Shearer (aus and qld), All big names in the day but never really saw the best of them at the Broncos.
Yes, but outside of Kevie making a cameo in 2001, none of them signed within 25 years.
Which is why 91 was the cut-off.
Sure but who give a shit about the lurkers 25 years... they are big signings in Bronco history outside of their initial entry into the comp.
Oh I see where you're coming from. My bad, I missed Foordy's initial post.
In fairness, it comes down to what's meant by really big signings. If that denotes any representative player, then it's fair to say that Foordy has a medical condition. Last time I checked, having 20+ fingers isn't normal!
However, if Lazarus is considered the measuring stick, then I can certainly see where the point is coming from.
Not to mention, most expansion clubs have to sign players in order to be viable. That's true for a lot of sports around the world. So I don't necessarily think it indicates that one side is likely to go to the market.
Oh I see where you're coming from. My bad, I missed Foordy's initial post.
In fairness, it comes down to what's meant by really big signings. If that denotes any representative player, then it's fair to say that Foordy has a medical condition. Last time I checked, having 20+ fingers isn't normal!
However, if Lazarus is considered the measuring stick, then I can certainly see where the point is coming from.
Not to mention, most expansion clubs have to sign players in order to be viable. That's true for a lot of sports around the world. So I don't necessarily think it indicates that one side is likely to go to the market.
Can we make a different thread for this please?