- Mar 14, 2008
- 9,277
- 11,946
it is an absurd train.After watching our left side defence in yesterday’s game, I’m all absurd the Gagai train.
it is an absurd train.After watching our left side defence in yesterday’s game, I’m all absurd the Gagai train.
it is an absurd train.
never on time.Waiting for Gagai?
Safe, conservative. Arthars, Asiata, Copley, Kelly, Levi, Mead, Te'o.. Seriously, could you assemble a list of more boring players if you even tried?
No way!
That's disgusting.
Brooks is the main problem with the Tigers. Also, him and Croft look and play like they are twins. They both suck.. We still have to get Croft off our books for next year.. Gamble is so much better than both of them.
Dogs fan page are claiming they've signed TPJ.
He's nothing like Croft with how he plays. Depending on the price, he does have the game to compliment Reynolds. I think he suffers a bit like Milford in terms of him being expected to be the main playmaker when his game probably more lends itself to being in support of a dominant halfback. He's a better half than anyone we have currently at the club ( unless Milf gets his mojo back, which he wont here).
Gamble will fade and go the way of Turpin. If we had any half decent halves he wouldnt be anywhere near our side, and Walters is about the same. Both good competitors, but you can only get away with that for so long in spine positions until you get found out, as we are seeing with Turpin.
The whole spine of 1,6,7 and 9 need sorting. We have our 7. Staggs is going to be our 6 for better or worse so that leaves the 1 and 9. Niu and Isaako are so inept in the fullback positions its not funny, Cobbo needs a good year minimum in ISC , and Turpin in the short term is ok, but as soon as a good hooker is available we need to be going all in on them.
Not that we are going to find a 9 for next year but agreed. Staggs is the only punt we should take in the halves and if not we stick to what we know will at least get the job done to what we hope as a top 8 standard in gamble and Kelly.None of that changes the fact he is a risk and an expensive one at that. We need a 9 more than anything, not ANOTHER punt on a half at another club who might be good if he just doesn't have to do all the organising...remind you of anyone currently at the club?
no they don't ... all they actually have to do is not offer him a contract for next season
The Staggs experiment needs to start this year so we have a full offseason to either persist with staggs at 6 or get a combo with Kelly or gamble going with Reynolds.Not that we are going to find a 9 for next year but agreed. Staggs is the only punt we should take in the halves and if not we stick to what we know will at least get the job done to what we hope as a top 8 standard in gamble and Kelly.
I don't think signing Brooks would be out of the box for the Broncos. It would be Brodie Croft all over again, trying to take somebody elses discards and get value out of it.
Walker didn't leave because the Broncos didn't value him. He left because the Broncos were a known basket case and all the managers were directing their talent elsewhere. On top of that they had just annoited Tom Dearden as the future halves prospect and we all saw how well the club developed him.
EDIT: How did AJ and Tui get grouped up in that lot?
You obviously don’t know much about coaching, mate. What you do is train all off season with a halves combination and then change it 120 minutes into the season. Then what you do is change it another 8 times in 16 games.The Staggs experiment needs to start this year so we have a full offseason to either persist with staggs at 6 or get a combo with Kelly or gamble going with Reynolds.
With a good full pre season under his belt Kelly could do really well in the 6.
If we were looking at someone to take a punt on offer Lachlan lewis a cheapy contract,curious if he would do better outside of the bulldogs
FFS: Please no.If we were looking at someone to take a punt on offer Lachlan lewis a cheapy contract,curious if he would do better outside of the bulldogs