Splinter
NRL Player
- Feb 16, 2013
- 2,818
- 989
Maybe they are going down on someone to get off the charge
Bulldogs vs Souths
- Thread starter Big Pete
- Start date
Splinter
NRL Player
- Feb 16, 2013
- 2,818
- 989
He deserves a minimum 4 weeks for inciting the Bulldogs fans along with Klemmer. I would also give him a week for the charge down, accidentally making contact on the kicker should be no defence
- Mar 4, 2008
- 35,052
- 41,901
The bolded parts suggest Graham could be in some strife, because given the direction he dived hitting the legs was a likely outcome IMO. he also left the ground, so thats 2 indicators that he meets.
Last edited:
Broncoman
State of Origin Rep
- Oct 9, 2011
- 7,691
- 1,118
Why should every supporter of the club be punished due to the actions of a minority?
Most teams in the world wouldn't have a fan base going by your logic
- Aug 5, 2013
- 4,168
- 2,820
foordy will start spelling correctly if you stop talking about yourself in the 3rd person. " huge lol".
- Apr 9, 2012
- 12,817
- 14,600
Because they're a shit club with shit supporters.
- Apr 9, 2012
- 12,817
- 14,600
It was reckless at best .....and as such, he should be suspended. I've got no problems with him sitting on the sidelines for a month or longer.
Broncoman
State of Origin Rep
- Oct 9, 2011
- 7,691
- 1,118
The Bulldogs fans I know are some of the best people I know and are very respectful individuals. Every club has scum cheering for them.
- Apr 9, 2012
- 12,817
- 14,600
How many clubs have their fans burning opposition teams effigies and or rioting in the streets.....or violently attacking match officials ........or violently accosting opposition fans on public transport after a game?
The Bulldogs fans tick all those boxes. Not too many other teams fans do ....
The Bulldogs fans tick all those boxes. Not too many other teams fans do ....
- Apr 26, 2008
- 34,578
- 35,550
Yeah? How many roughly of the about 30,000 Bulldogs fans?
Don't make exaggerations to drive a point home. A few very good friends of mine (from all backgrounds), were in that Bulldogs Army, they didn't throw bottles, some people did.
It's disgusting behaviour but it's also disgusting to judge everyone on what some people do.
Last edited:
- Mar 7, 2008
- 13,620
- 10,547
At first I thought I had done that until I realised I actually used it as an adjective! I went back to check how I could have done that ...doh
- Oct 17, 2013
- 12,841
- 14,848
How many were throwing things, have ripped out seats, threatened people at games, brought flairs and weapons to games, hurt people at games? More than the "1 or 2" fans every Bulldog fan keeps saying.
- Aug 5, 2013
- 4,168
- 2,820
It's ok Huge. Socnorb won't hold it against you. I could help hearing it in a cave man voice. Huge make fire , now huge happy , now huge no longer need woman to keep warm
- Apr 26, 2008
- 34,578
- 35,550
Yeah I agree, they've got a bunch of idiots and they need to get serious with lifetime bans, it's definitely not 1 or 2, probably close to a few dozen people.
That being said I've been to Broncos games and Bulldogs games and I enjoyed the Bulldogs games much more. Brisbane fans are too quiet, but obviously going to far the other way is disgusting as well.
In saying that, I have a respect for the Bulldogs fan base because they always turn up in numbers and actually support their team unlike Pathetic Roosters fans who struggle to get 10k crowds when they've got the best team in the competition.
That being said I've been to Broncos games and Bulldogs games and I enjoyed the Bulldogs games much more. Brisbane fans are too quiet, but obviously going to far the other way is disgusting as well.
In saying that, I have a respect for the Bulldogs fan base because they always turn up in numbers and actually support their team unlike Pathetic Roosters fans who struggle to get 10k crowds when they've got the best team in the competition.
- Feb 27, 2010
- 30,071
- 12,346
Good find [MENTION=2144]Twiztid[/MENTION]. Graham will probably get a few weeks based on that...
He was a chance of charging the ball, as it literally passed between his arms, so I couldn't call it more than careless.
What I cannot understand, is why is this only found on the judiciary guidelines, but not in the actual game rules or guidelines? A case could be made that the player is not obliged to know about those...?
He was a chance of charging the ball, as it literally passed between his arms, so I couldn't call it more than careless.
What I cannot understand, is why is this only found on the judiciary guidelines, but not in the actual game rules or guidelines? A case could be made that the player is not obliged to know about those...?
