Steve
NRL Player
- Mar 4, 2008
- 1,002
- 3
Right decision.
Steve said:Right decision.
Fozz said:http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,27243791-5018993,00.html
got off because it was "not significant enough to cause injury".
So all those players on dangerous tackles, head highs and the like can get off if they don't cause injury?
Fozz said:http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,27243791-5018993,00.html
got off because it was "not significant enough to cause injury".
So all those players on dangerous tackles, head highs and the like can get off if they don't cause injury?
Coxy said:Steve said:Right decision.
How on earth is that the right decision?
Dexter said:Just another example of why we hate NSW. They control the game in every way.
That is just rediculous to let Hayne off, precedent has been set for anyone now to argue that line.
FU#K I HATE NSW.
IMO they do, that is the reason there are still too many teams in Sydney. They have lost 4 in a row because at the moment they are crap and we are good.Scotty said:Dexter said:Just another example of why we hate NSW. They control the game in every way.
That is just rediculous to let Hayne off, precedent has been set for anyone now to argue that line.
FU#K I HATE NSW.
Bit OTT. If they controlled the game in every way I'm sure they wouldn't have just lost 4 in a row.
.
chazta said:wat happened with lewis??