jarro65
State of Origin Rep
- Jun 26, 2008
- 7,187
- 3,215
Re: The big Dugan discussion
He was a lot quicker when he didn't have all those tattoos.
He was a lot quicker when he didn't have all those tattoos.
wait on.....
so you ask me to find the part where he runs the length to score because you cant find it, but then you say the only time you remember it is when he does it via an intercept.......which is in the video.........that you cant find any length of the field runs in........?
theres this one too - 85m kick return is usually considered "length of the field": http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=nxWeE9-hqL0#t=227s
i rate darius boyd, but i think calling him one of the best ball playing fullbacks of all time is over exaggerating a fair bit. he can do the second man play, but thats about it.
Big Dave said:Dugan isn't quick. I would back Boyd in a foot race any day
Oh. Hold on..
You're the one saying how he scores all these length of field tries and that I should watch the video.
There wasn't even one try in the video where he ran the length of the field.
But yes.. posting facts you have never been good at.
He has hardly scored any tries since arriving at the Knights. He has never been a big try scorer since playing fullback.It's more an indictment of the quality of ball playing fullbacks really - ball playing fullbacks have only become a common feature since 2005 or so. Before then, it seemed like really only amazing players like Langlands, Churchill or Lockyer had those skills. I don't think Boyd is on that level, but certainly next in line and superior to Dugan.
I'd be interested to see that race.
Boyd doesn't exactly strike me as quick anymore. We're talking about length of the field tries and I don't think Boyd has scored one since he transferred to the Dragons.
I'm not saying Dugan is exceptionally quick, just faster than Boyd which isn't a stretch.
Why? Is there a rumour or some news about him?What's going on with Folau?
Dugan would win easily in a foot race with Boyd.
see i can say things without anything to back it up just as easily as you can. only difference is that youtube has more evidence supporting me than it does you.
wait on.....
so you ask me to find the part where he runs the length to score because you cant find it, but then you say the only time you remember it is when he does it via an intercept.......which is in the video.........that you cant find any length of the field runs in........?
theres this one too - 85m kick return is usually considered "length of the field": http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=nxWeE9-hqL0#t=227s