mrslong
International Rep
- Mar 25, 2008
- 13,282
- 13,450
Can we rename this thread “Milly and Crofty” please. Feel it’s more appropriate.
Theoretically, what would Boyds or Milly need to do to get benched or dropped?
Croft apparently begged for another chance, so you would expect him to do something this week. As for the others, ****Well by the sounds of it neither are being dropped this week so that’ll make everyone happy!
I hope that isn’t true. Imagine choosing a team based on who begs the hardest.Croft apparently begged for another chance, so you would expect him to do something this week. As for the others, ****
Who knows what to believe these days, but if it's true he better aim up.I hope that isn’t true. Imagine choosing a team based on who begs the hardest.
Sure, they’ve all regressed, but if Milf was as good as you thought he was, he should still Have regressed to be a middling player, instead of comfortably one of our worst/least effective. Statistically speaking he’d currently be Just about the worst Half in the competition, so if he was this supposed gun beforehand, his decline is far greater than those around him.If the rest of the team was playing to their normal standard I would agree but everyone is going backwards at a similar rate to milf.
Imagine having a guy who’s several years younger, has played 20% as many games, and is doing it all for a third of the money ‘only’ winning by 3/2 and thinking that was a good result for Milford.I was anticipating a landslide towards Croft but it goes to show he’s been fucking shit when it’s only 3/2 in his favour.
It doesn't really mean much though, does it? Would you trust the collective wisdom of an internet forum to make good coaching decisions?Imagine having a guy who’s several years younger, has played 20% as many games, and is doing it all for a third of the money ‘only’ winning by 3/2 and thinking that was a good result for Milford.
I was anticipating a bigger swing toward Croft.Imagine having a guy who’s several years younger, has played 20% as many games, and is doing it all for a third of the money ‘only’ winning by 3/2 and thinking that was a good result for Milford.
If Milford was even close to as he good as he’s made out to be, this wouldn’t be close even for pay people.It doesn't really mean much though, does it? Would you trust the collective wisdom of an internet forum to make good coaching decisions?
Love to know where you got that statistic from? I get you’re looking to paint the narrative that you stood on your own against the tide of Seibold backers, but I think if you were being more honest you’d see that the majority were probably pretty in favour of punting Bennett (which I doubt many would still see as not the right move given we did it for Bellamy) but pretty ambivalent and open minded about Seibold which is who we ended up with.I was anticipating a bigger swing toward Croft.
most people on here thought Pies was a good idea so Thought they’d get this wrong as well.
Would be interesting, things just seem to happen around him (staggs) and his defensive reads were also better at 6. Could be good to have a strong runner of the ball but i cant say i have seen enough of his passing or kicking game to really comment too much.7. Dearden
6. Staggs
Why not?
Milf is clueless, always in 3 minds with ball in hand running to the defence line, and EVERYTIME takes the dumb option.. Sick of his shite, million dollar or whatever kick him out