[OFFICIAL] Anthony Milford to Broncos

[rnabokov]

you might have mentioned it though, so it is still probably a known unknown, but that depends on how much you know about what is supposed to be unknown. That is probably another unknown, but that again may be known or unknown.

Oh yes. What is absolutely known at this point in time is that there are a lot of known unknowns, and we also don't know that we don't know, and what we don't know.

But, someone does ....

As Tonto said to the Lone Ranger when surrounded by murderous Indians: What do you mean "we" are surrounded, paleface.

 

[Fozz]

 

[Manbush]

if the clause is as Furner says, then i have absolutely no idea why they bothered to go to the trouble of inserting it into the contract, as it would have the same affect as not having a get out clause at all. and i doubt Ayoub would be that stupid

Ask a lawyer who specialises in contracts those sort of clauses aren't that uncommon, it lets either party use them on reasonable grounds and not just willy nilly, they do serve a purpose and basically the same as your "meeting certain criteria", ie if they meet the criteria they'll both agree to it but if one party doesn't believe it's been met then it will be challenged, it's just not a clause totally giving power to one side, ie Fergos current one that if Furner goes so can he, that one cannot be challenged.

Say if Halo had another heart attack the clause would obviously have merit and not be able to be challenged on reasonable grounds, its a clause that protects both parties.

Ps Foordy you might want to fix your signature to "you're capable of"

 

[Crazy Sam]

who cares about the clause, it's clear the guy wants to leave the Raiders and I find it difficult to believe he'll want to stay at the Raiders beyond his current contract given how they are carrying on about this.

 

[Manbush]

My take on it is if the Furners can't convince him to stay they won't challenge the clause but obviously they'll try whatever it takes to make him want to stay. If he is to leave I'd guess part of the agreement would be its not announced till after the Raiders season is over (which with injuries and our draw could be very soon)

 

[Rhys van Beurden]

Apparently Ferguson wants out now also, although that was reported by Rothfield, so take that with a grain of salt. Hope that moron doesn't fluff things up for Milford to Broncos.

 

[Manbush]

Apparently Ferguson wants out now also, although that was reported by Rothfield, so take that with a grain of salt. Hope that moron doesn't fluff things up for Milford to Broncos.

Rothfield is a well known antagonist of the Raiders and Ferguson.

Apparently he wants to be with his uncle Mundine, how long till a player wants out to be with his puppy dog

 

[Socnorb]

So Dugan is Ferguson's (puppy) oh . How cute.

 

[Unbreakable]

Sounds to me like Furner has come out and told all his high profile players to go public asking for compassionate releases, which of course the NRL wouldn't allow, forcing them to make a rule change in relation to compassionate releases, meaning we don't get Barba, or Milford.

Maybe I'm reading too much into things.

 

[Dexter]

Rothfield is a well known antagonist of the Raiders and Ferguson.

Apparently he wants to be with his uncle Mundine, how long till a player wants out to be with his puppy dog

That's already happened to the Raiders, hasn't it?

 

[Manbush]

Haha I'll pay that Dexter.

Unbreak nah it's just Rothfield, he's run so many articles against the Furners and Fergo, they appear to be his arch nemesis, key part and the agenda in the article is how his beloved Sharks are keen to have him. He's seen the negotiations through the media so he's trying it.

 

[Fozz]

It would be funny to see Ferguson end up at the Sharks again. Guess he's given up on winning a premiership under Furner.

 

[Broncoman]

Will be epic to see Fergo return to the Sharks

 

[Morkel]

Will be epic to see Fergo return to the Sharks

With his tail between his legs...

 

[theshed]

It wouldn't really be with his tail between his legs. He is a gun player who was playing on shit team. The team (other than the whole ASADA thing), is now closer to an acceptable standard for a player of his potential.

He was too good for them and now they have improved the issues that would scare off a young talent such as himself.

 

[subsbligh]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnVUHWCynig

Over and over in my head everytime I read this thread

 

[subsbligh]

Ask a lawyer who specialises in contracts those sort of clauses aren't that uncommon, it lets either party use them on reasonable grounds and not just willy nilly, they do serve a purpose and basically the same as your "meeting certain criteria", ie if they meet the criteria they'll both agree to it but if one party doesn't believe it's been met then it will be challenged, it's just not a clause totally giving power to one side, ie Fergos current one that if Furner goes so can he, that one cannot be challenged.

Say if Halo had another heart attack the clause would obviously have merit and not be able to be challenged on reasonable grounds, its a clause that protects both parties.

Ps Foordy you might want to fix your signature to "you're capable of"

It depends entirely on the specific words used in the contract which no one on this forum has seen or has a copy of.

 

[worm of the north]

It would be funny to see Ferguson end up at the Sharks again. Guess he's given up on winning a premiership under Furner.

Won't happen. There are many other sides he would go to if these rumours be true. But I sense this is just Flanagan/Rothfield playing with untruths to destabilise the side further. That and the fact Fergo's clause only related to Furner himself, which we all know he is not going anywhere, I am pretty safe with the Raiders declining this one out of court..

However, if he did sign with the Sharkies I wonder how long they would take to attempt to pay off the shire lady he fondled?