Old Mate
NRL Player
- Jul 5, 2008
- 2,870
- 2,500
I love how you gloat about trolling the HQ and how we're all such easy targets, would love to see what would happen should someone do the same at the Raiderps forum.
We all know they're a bit thin skinned when it come pointing out the obvious.I love how you gloat about trolling the HQ and how we're all such easy targets, would love to see what would happen should someone do the same at the Raiderps forum.
The greenest maybe.The inevitability is priceless. The Raider's joke of a coach will have them outside the top 8 regardless of their talent. All the players will be burned out by round 15 and Milford will have no room to do anything. Then he'll be over-rated, and the Broncos will be suckers for gambling on a rookie. And for falling for Sticky's $1.2 mill bluff which was only leaked to the media to drive up the Broncos' contract price.
Do you guys have a "The Greatest" equivalent who sat next to Milford and was assured he'd be staying in Canberra?
Do you guys have a "The Greatest" equivalent who sat next to Milford and was assured he'd be staying in Canberra?
Its not that interesting its called third party agreements, pretty much well accepted in the RL community and I thought on this board that players earn a lot more then what there club is paying them through TPAs.Sooo it's all about cash, but if the Raiders offer him a truck load more cash then he still comes home to Brisbane it will be because he wants less money.
Interesting concept, elaborate if you could, you may have the answer to the salary cap issues and don't even know it.
Its not that interesting its called third party agreements, pretty much well accepted in the RL community and I thought on this board that players earn a lot more then what there club is paying them through TPAs.
Just like old Lockyer who was 250k, he was probably on 600-1m by the end and the majority of it would have been tpas.
Look at what is happening with Fifita if you want a look at the amount players are paid as opposed to the funny figure they get put through the salary cap at.
Thus, in conclusion wherever he goes, chances are its for the money.
On a different topic, all the high and mighty garbage re milford being a dog if he doesn't go to Brisbane and how terrible he is for using his fathers health as an excuse, maybe that's true, but how can you dump all of that on milford and his manager alone without apportioning a percentage of the blame on Andrew Gee / Broncos / News Limited.
Lets be honest, if any of us got a big offer elsewhere we would consider it, we might even agree to it, but then if our current employer offered to meet or beat it and we could get out of our old agreement scott free, chances are we would all think very hard about staying. So really all the bleating on here is just that .... bleating.
I really hope that was sarcasm! :laugh:He can't go to the Dogs, he can only reneg on the deal if it's to stay with the Raiders.
He can't go to the Dogs, he can only reneg on the deal if it's to stay with the Raiders.
where has the Bulldogs been mentioned with regards to Milford?
I really hope that was sarcasm! :laugh: