Harm is not in the title, how does it hurt the game if players move to other clubs? Club loyalty is practically dead these days, there's not much you can do to promote it unless salary cap rules are changes and there are exemptions for loyal players. It's not just Sydney teams doing it, it's all clubs. The game has evolved. It's more about money these days than playing for one club. It's the nature of the sport these days. Nothing to do with how Sydney teams pinch each others players and saturate the market.
Anyway, the only club that is dead weight is Cronulla. Small supporter base and they're in an area that pretty much have another 2 teams occupying it (St George and Souths). Always in a financial heap.
Is anyone else as sick of the Bulldogs as me on here? What purpose do they serve? They just keep buying players... they can't go for a week without doing so. Even the Roosters actually have so home grown talent.
Yeah you debated the topic but you couldn't resist the urge at a cheap dig.
You live in a fantasy land of tunnels, great night life, no passion and losing origin
The Rock said:You're stuck in the 80's champ. In this day and age, Penrith juniors don't just stay in Penrith, they may go elsewhere. Same with Campbelltown Juniors or Parramatta. It's pretty damn easy to take a quick turn down the road and head somewhere else in Sydney. Brisbane have the luxury of a big city all to themselves, so your chance of retaining a Brisbane juniour is pretty awesome. Same with Townsville. Where else would they go? NZ is also another example.
I don't blame them at all. This is a team who developed Willie Mason, Nate Myles, Sonny Bill Williams, Roy Asotasi, Steve Price and Jonathan Thurston.
They'd play at Suncorp.
My point exactly.
Hence why, Sydney have too many teams and you wouldn't see so many transfers IF they didn't and if we expanded the game.
When the game grows and we bring more teams in, I just hope we let struggling Sydney clubs rot & die.