Sproj
Immortal
Senior Staff
- Sep 6, 2013
- 54,899
- 67,092
Vidot was looking amazing at the World Cup, why has he fallen down the pecking order [MENTION=8272]1910[/MENTION]?
I called for Hoffman to be 5/8 for this year, at the end of last year. I wouldn't be surprised if that was most of what was spoken about in their little pow pow with Broncos management.
My team would look like this...
1. Barba
2. Mills
3. Copley
4. Reed (Remember guys, Reed plays on the left side, or he SHOULD play on the left side)
5. Vidot
6. Hoffman
7. Hunt
8. Hannant
9. McCullough
10. McGuire
11. Thaiday
12. Glenn
13. Parker
14. Granville
15. Gillett
16. Kennedy
17. Hala
Well Hoffman in the 6 will be a great way to display his non existent passing and kicking skills.
Maybe he hasn't... Maybe he had one spot already sewn up, so we were trialling the other outside backs
theres no way vidot is the only player rested from the warriors trial because he has a spot sewn up.
im not sure what it is but they obviously aren't happy with his form or something. maybe he doesn't put in enough effort at training in griffins eyes. maybe he just isnt part of griffins favourite playing group.
its like when we signed lama tasi last year and gave him stints on the field of 5 to 9 minutes. it just didnt make sense to me.
maybe we don't let players get away with being slack as much as most other clubs, and to be fair both those guys are discards from their previous clubs. but to suggest our standards are that high would also suggest we wouldnt defend like u12's and get 50 pts put on us in a trial.
which makes it even more bewildering. yes its "just a trial" so players were being "trialled". but vidots new to a club and if he was going to get a run in rnd 1 i think you'd have him at the trial so he can get used to his teammates.
The vibe I get from Vidot's public face is that he is all about Vidot, **** authority.
He'd prefer Maranta with a broken leg than Vidot with an "attitude problem".
What's his attitude problem? I havent seen his 'public face'