Round 1 - Bulldogs vrs Broncos; Pre-Match Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Vidot was looking amazing at the World Cup, why has he fallen down the pecking order [MENTION=8272]1910[/MENTION]?
 
Vidot was looking amazing at the World Cup, why has he fallen down the pecking order @1910?

Maybe he hasn't... Maybe he had one spot already sewn up, so we were trialling the other outside backs
 
I called for Hoffman to be 5/8 for this year, at the end of last year. I wouldn't be surprised if that was most of what was spoken about in their little pow pow with Broncos management.

My team would look like this...

1. Barba
2. Mills
3. Copley
4. Reed (Remember guys, Reed plays on the left side, or he SHOULD play on the left side)
5. Vidot
6. Hoffman
7. Hunt

8. Hannant
9. McCullough
10. McGuire
11. Thaiday
12. Glenn
13. Parker

14. Granville
15. Gillett
16. Kennedy
17. Hala
 
Last edited:
I called for Hoffman to be 5/8 for this year, at the end of last year. I wouldn't be surprised if that was most of what was spoken about in their little pow pow with Broncos management.

My team would look like this...

1. Barba
2. Mills
3. Copley
4. Reed (Remember guys, Reed plays on the left side, or he SHOULD play on the left side)
5. Vidot
6. Hoffman
7. Hunt

8. Hannant
9. McCullough
10. McGuire
11. Thaiday
12. Glenn
13. Parker

14. Granville
15. Gillett
16. Kennedy
17. Hala

That's my team also.

Barba HAS to be fullback .... and Maranta shouldn't be there at all.

Gillett would provide more impact off the bench IMO .... he seems to drop off a bit during the course of a game so bring him on for shorter bursts.

Vidot has to be there also .... buggered if i know what's going on with him at the moment though ??
 
tfw we buy Lowrie and don't even use him, if Hala is the same as last year I'd rather Lowrie on the bench than him, in fact I'd rather Lowrie over Granville as well, McCullough has been our best player in the trials / nines, we can't afford to sub him off at any stage of the game.
 
Maybe he hasn't... Maybe he had one spot already sewn up, so we were trialling the other outside backs

Just what we thought with Kemp last year...
 
Our options are ordinary so I'll just be happy if Hook picks Strasser or Nikorima in the halves. At least the are players who play in the halves. If they fail then fine but give them a crack. Barba at fullback with Hoffman on one wing and Vidot or Drew on the other.
 
theres no way vidot is the only player rested from the warriors trial because he has a spot sewn up.

im not sure what it is but they obviously aren't happy with his form or something. maybe he doesn't put in enough effort at training in griffins eyes. maybe he just isnt part of griffins favourite playing group.

its like when we signed lama tasi last year and gave him stints on the field of 5 to 9 minutes. it just didnt make sense to me.

maybe we don't let players get away with being slack as much as most other clubs, and to be fair both those guys are discards from their previous clubs. but to suggest our standards are that high would also suggest we wouldnt defend like u12's and get 50 pts put on us in a trial.
 
Last edited:
Even with half the effort, Vidot is still a far better option at wing than Maranta. Surely Griffin can see that and bite the bullet. Maranta is a failed experiment, nothing more.

If his contract gets torn up, and I hope it does, I think that's his career over. I can't think of anyone else that would want Maranta, he is that bad.
 
Bulldogs $1.60
Broncos $2.35

Then again, it's the NRL. Things change from week to week. Parramatta somehow manage to win some games during the year.

Potential rookie fullback or Morris moonlighting as fullback - the midfield bomb strategy might work.

Reed FTS.
 
which makes it even more bewildering. yes its "just a trial" so players were being "trialled". but vidots new to a club and if he was going to get a run in rnd 1 i think you'd have him at the trial so he can get used to his teammates.
 
theres no way vidot is the only player rested from the warriors trial because he has a spot sewn up.

im not sure what it is but they obviously aren't happy with his form or something. maybe he doesn't put in enough effort at training in griffins eyes. maybe he just isnt part of griffins favourite playing group.

its like when we signed lama tasi last year and gave him stints on the field of 5 to 9 minutes. it just didnt make sense to me.

maybe we don't let players get away with being slack as much as most other clubs, and to be fair both those guys are discards from their previous clubs. but to suggest our standards are that high would also suggest we wouldnt defend like u12's and get 50 pts put on us in a trial.

The vibe I get from Vidot's public face is that he is all about Vidot, **** authority.

He'd prefer Maranta with a broken leg than Vidot with an "attitude problem".
 
which makes it even more bewildering. yes its "just a trial" so players were being "trialled". but vidots new to a club and if he was going to get a run in rnd 1 i think you'd have him at the trial so he can get used to his teammates.

Griffinisms.

Don't try to understand him, he's not worth the headache
 
The vibe I get from Vidot's public face is that he is all about Vidot, **** authority.

He'd prefer Maranta with a broken leg than Vidot with an "attitude problem".

What's his attitude problem? I havent seen his 'public face'
 
What's his attitude problem? I havent seen his 'public face'

To be honest B4L he kind of loves himself a bit. I have him on instagram and he's always posting videos of himself in the car lip singing human nature, etc. I see a lot of the broncos boys commenting shit like "mate, get this down now" etc etc and vidot just laughs. He's very humble in real life though (from what ive seen) so I don't know why he does shit like that on social media
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Active Now

  • Browny
  • porouian
  • Bucking Beads
  • Mustafur
  • Broncosgirl
  • kman
  • I bleed Maroon
  • Financeguy
  • KevieBurnerAccount
  • bb_gun
  • FACTHUNT
  • leith1
  • Santa
  • Johnny92
Top
  AdBlock Message
Please consider adding BHQ to your Adblock Whitelist. We do our best to make sure it doesn't affect your experience on the website, and the funds help us pay server and software costs.