Porthoz
International Captain
Senior Staff
- Feb 27, 2010
- 29,521
- 11,929
Less convenient than counting premierships won with teams which would never fit the salary cap.Convenient. Selecting which time periods you want to use.
Less convenient than counting premierships won with teams which would never fit the salary cap.Convenient. Selecting which time periods you want to use.
What era was that? The cap has been in place since the 80's. Didn't Canberra get charged for being in breach of it in 1990?5 of which from a different cap free era, and I did mention this millennium...
I respect your opinion. Unlike others, i don't mock or sarcastically put down other peoples opinion if they don't coincide with my own.
At the end of the day, we are all Broncos fans and want the team to do well.
T some players there that are older and have reached their development peeks. Throw in a couple of serious injurys such as Maccas knee and Boyds total body and you have a spine with few weapons, dull blades and blunt points.
I wouldn't like any of our Broncos players to be injured in any game. However, if they are liability for our progress or absolutely DO NOT contribute in our favor, then deadest I do not want them in my team. We must throw in someone in at 1 & 9 and see how they go. Most importantly, we MUST be proactive in making changes to our 1-17. No individuals position MUST be guaranteed. Absolutely not.
Matter of fact when every other team's are trying out with 18 or 19 year old's at spine OR making changes to their "SPINE", why can't we? Why don't we EVER try those promising half's?
There are multiple posts showing that these 'promising halves' just aren't performing at ISC level.
There are multiple posts showing that these 'promising halves' just aren't performing at ISC level.
Based on people’s opinions. Not saying they aren’t valid as opinions, but you won’t know a player is truly ready until they play first grade. Now I’m not suggesting you throw players in for the sake of it, but at the same time they could be that type of player that steps up against the big boys.
Also I’m going to pitch a thought and say halves are the hardest position in which to state your case for promotion.
Not opinion posts.
Statistical posts.
Cronk is that guy, and boy do we need a CronkYou can use stats to prove or disprove anything.
Besides, a half can control an entire match with no real tangible stats to say so
There was a symbolic NSWRL salary cap from 1990, ranging from $800K to $1.5M, depending on club circumstances, and it was not audited.What era was that? The cap has been in place since the 80's. Didn't Canberra get charged for being in breach of it in 1990?
Some blokes just play better on the big stage. If they have the confidence and belief in themselves that they belong in 1st grade then they may lack the commitment necessary to perform in a lower grade.
Andrew Fafita is probably a good example of this. He clearly had the talent to dominate in Qcup but he didn't. He was given his debut in first grade and has never looked back.
We shouldn't be so scared to give some of these young blokes and opportunity. Sink or swim. If they sink, then atleast they will have a better understanding of what is required to cut it at the highest level.
David Fifita*
There was a symbolic NSWRL salary cap from 1990, ranging from $800K to $1.5M, depending on club circumstances, and it was not audited.
The SL war blew it apart and they started working on a new one ($3.25M), which was put in place in 1998, however this acknowledged notional values for player contracts signed for Super League clubs.
Auditing and breaches only started to be dealt from 2001 and beyond.
Some blokes just play better on the big stage. If they have the confidence and belief in themselves that they belong in 1st grade then they may lack the commitment necessary to perform in a lower grade.
Andrew Fafita is probably a good example of this. He clearly had the talent to dominate in Qcup but he didn't. He was given his debut in first grade and has never looked back.
We shouldn't be so scared to give some of these young blokes and opportunity. Sink or swim. If they sink, then atleast they will have a better understanding of what is required to cut it at the highest level.
I don't know how they "got done", but rumours are it was a whistle-blower. They were only fined at the time for the amount they were over their cap, as there was no breach system in place.How did Canberra get done if it's not audited? Self reported?