Plus it happened before the niteclub opened too the public. There was a private function/party on. As in the club was opened early to a few select people. So technically not a public toilet so to speak. Well that's what i was lead to believe anyway.
Aeetee said:Plus it happened before the niteclub opened too the public. There was a private function/party on. As in the club was opened early to a few select people. So technically not a public toilet so to speak. Well that's what i was lead to believe anyway.
Coxy said:They had the woman who was in charge of implementing it with the NRL on radio this morning saying that clubs and the NRL had been excellent in applying zero tolerance to matters concerning behaviour towards women and she was sure they would continue in this case.
I don't know details of the policy, but it basically centres around the attitude towards women that they're not just there for sexual entertainment etc.
And you'd have to say taking a chick into the toilets for a gangbang is pretty much up there.
The Rock said:Seriously dude, don't be so thick.
lockyer47 said:schmix said:I wish the NRL made it easier for clubs to do the right thing. Who wants to sack these guys, only to see them playing for another club next year? I know they can deregister contracts (although this rarely happens), but it would be nice if the Broncos had first dibs on the players after the suspension is over (whether that be 2, 3 years down the track). More like a 'suspension without pay' rather than an all out sacking.
No I disagree, IF the broncos are to sack Hunt (assuming alleged facts) and he is NOT the filmer, then I believe he has every right to play at any other NRL club and Broncos would have to accept that. I believe this because sacking him would be a CLUB decision, by breaching the club's code of conduct. In essence he had consensual sex with a woman in the toilet of a night club. IF any other NRL club was still happy to have them on their roster, so be it.
It would be rubbish to say he should be banned from all NRL clubs.
michael22 said:The girl was up for it - let's not lose sight of that. Otherwise these players would have to live a life of celibacy.
The Rock said:Hope this incident doesn't hang over our heads in the years to come like it has to the Dogs.
Astroboy said:The image of the Broncos club, a club I've been proud to suport since 1988, is at stake here. If the story is true I'm immensely disappointed that these guys who represent the Broncos, and who so many look up to, can be such complete IDIOTS! As someone else said, especially Hunt - iconic player, future captain and all. It has to be one of the darkest days in the club's history.
This is a case in which I'd be happy to see the blokes gone from the club - actually not happy, what a loss they would be, but happier than to see them keep playing and representing our great club. Anything less after getting rid of Seymore, Costigan etc would be complete hypocrisy. Unacceptable behaviour is just that, whether you're a fringe first grader or an established star. Forget the "business decisions" etc, it's a weak-minded sellout to even consider such things. The honour and reputation of the club, built largely by Wayne Bennett, means more to me than most other things about the Broncos. I would get rid of these guys if the story is true, yes even at the expense of this year's premiership. I want the Broncos to be a team I can still cheer for. A team who I can still be proud to support. We are not the Bulldogs ffs. We are the Broncos and we do not (or at least, should not) tolerate this sh!t.